Cluster-Head and Border-Node Based Cluster Routing Protocol for LR-WPAN

被引:2
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ]
Ge, Hongli [1 ]
Dai, Yuehua [1 ]
Xu, Dong [1 ]
Zhang, Jin [1 ]
Gao, Qiang [1 ]
Zhao, Shaoying [1 ]
Lee, Jangsu [2 ]
机构
[1] Samsung R&D Inst China, SW R&D Grp, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Samsung Elect Co, Device Solut, Software R&D Ctr, Yongin, South Korea
来源
IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS IEEE AINA 2016 | 2016年
关键词
proactive; reactive; cluster; DSDV; AODV; border node; cluster head;
D O I
10.1109/AINA.2016.31
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the previous researches, a great number of routing protocols have been proposed in mobile ad-hoc networks (MANET). But it's hard to be adopted efficiently in low rate-wireless personal area network (LR-WPAN) because there are additional particular constraints of the packet size, bandwidth and so on. To improve the performance in this environment, we propose a Cluster-head and Border-node based Cluster Routing Protocol (CBCRP). CBCRP focuses on the environment that the intra-cluster is stable without frequent topology change. For the intra-cluster routing, we optimize the DSDV which is the proactive way to reduce the end-to-end delay maintaining the low cost of routing overhead. The intra-cluster route information is maintained in both of the cluster head and member nodes. For inter-cluster routing, we optimize the AODV which is the reactive way to reduce the flooding overhead maintaining the network performance. The source cluster-head, destination cluster-head and all the intermediate border nodes are in charge of the inter-cluster route discovery, while only border nodes are in charge of the inter-cluster data transmission. In the simulation result using NS-2, CBCRP shows better performance than the cluster based routing protocol (CBRP), about 21% lower end-to-end delay, 67% lower packet overhead and 60% lower packet loss rate at best case.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P ACM SIGCOMM 94 C C
  • [2] Bemmoussat C.E., 2013, 2013 INT C COMP APPL, P1
  • [3] CHAKERES I, 2006, DYNAMIC MANET DEMAND
  • [4] Clausen T., 2003, Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR)
  • [5] Haas Z., 2002, ZONE ROUTING PROTOCO
  • [6] Hachichi H, 2011, 2011 SAUDI INT EL CO, P1
  • [7] Hinds Alex, 2013, INT J INFORM ED TECH, V3
  • [8] Hu Y.C., 2007, The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4
  • [9] Jiang M., 1999, CLUSTER BASED ROUTIN
  • [10] Kaur Dilpreet, 2013, International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, V5, P39, DOI 10.5815/ijcnis.2013.03.05