Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study

被引:28
|
作者
Litchfield, Ian J. [1 ]
Bentham, Louise M. [2 ]
Lilford, Richard J. [4 ]
McManus, Richard J. [5 ]
Greenfield, Sheila M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Occupat & Environm Med, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Med Sociol, Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Warwick, Warwick Ctr Appl Hlth Res & Delivery, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Oxford, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Primary Care, Oxford, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2015年 / 65卷 / 632期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
diagnostic tests; patient safety; practice management; primary care; qualitative research; quality of care; PREFERENCES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp15X683929
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Although the number of blood tests ordered in primary care continues to increase, efficient systems for the communication of blood test results to patients are lacking. This is a concern in terms of both patient safety and patient satisfaction. Aim To gain an understanding of patient perspectives on organisational and technological aspects of current and prospective systems for communicating laboratory test results in primary care, and the influences that impact patients' preferred methods for receiving results. Design and setting Qualitative study using patient focus groups in four primary care practices in Birmingham, UK. Method The primary care practices were purposively selected to ensure they varied in size, socioeconomic environment, and the default pathways they used to communicate test results. A total of 26 patients from the four practices who had had a recent blood test were recruited. Over a 6 month period in 2011, six, 1-hour focus groups were conducted at the four practices involved in the study. Results Patients expressed a preference for receiving results from the ordering GP or a clinically qualified member of staff. Suggestions for refining current systems included improved access to phlebotomy appointments, better management of patient telephone calls, and a clear, accessible protocol for the communication of results. Conclusion Despite the testing and result communication process being a core activity in primary care, it was found that practices could improve their service in a number of areas. Patients described frequent delays and inconsistency in both the level of information and the method of communication, as well as dissatisfaction with non-clinical staff relaying results. Patient preferences for result communication based on their experience of current systems have produced practical suggestions to improve processes.
引用
收藏
页码:E133 / E140
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test result communication in primary care: clinical and office staff perspectives
    Litchfield, Ian J.
    Bentham, Louise M.
    Lilford, Richard J.
    Greenfield, Sheila M.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 31 (05) : 592 - 597
  • [2] Adaption, implementation and evaluation of collaborative service improvements in the testing and result communication process in primary care from patient and staff perspectives: a qualitative study
    Ian J. Litchfield
    Louise M. Bentham
    Richard J. Lilford
    Richard J. McManus
    Ann Hill
    Sheila Greenfield
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [3] Adaption, implementation and evaluation of collaborative service improvements in the testing and result communication process in primary care from patient and staff perspectives: a qualitative study
    Litchfield, Ian J.
    Bentham, Louise M.
    Lilford, Richard J.
    McManus, Richard J.
    Hill, Ann
    Greenfield, Sheila
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [4] 'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA
    Olson, Anthony W.
    Bucaloiu, Andrei
    Allen, Clayton, I
    Tusing, Lorraine D.
    Henzler-Buckingham, Hillary A.
    Gregor, Christina M.
    Freitag, Laura A.
    Hooker, Stephanie A.
    Rossom, Rebecca C.
    Solberg, Leif, I
    Wright, Eric A.
    Haller, Irina, V
    Romagnoli, Katrina M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [5] A qualitative study of patient perspectives of care management services in Comprehensive Primary Care Plus
    Lechner, Amanda
    Williams, Nyna
    Kogan, Rachel
    Hays, Burke
    Feeley-Summerl, Theresa
    Chen, Tammy
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, 39 (06) : 1103 - 1108
  • [6] Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice
    Litchfield, Ian
    Bentham, Louise
    Lilford, Richard
    McManus, Richard J.
    Hill, Ann
    Greenfield, Sheila
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (11) : 691 - 699
  • [7] Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening A Qualitative Study
    Kanodra, Neeti M.
    Pope, Charlene
    Halbert, Chanita H.
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    Rice, LaShanta J.
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2016, 13 (11) : 1977 - 1982
  • [8] Improving COPD Care in a Medically Underserved Primary Care Clinic: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives
    Glasser, Irene
    Wang, Fei
    Reardon, Jane
    Vergara, Cunegundo D.
    Salvietti, Ralph
    Acevedo, Myrtha
    Santana, Blanca
    Fortunato, Gil
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2016, 13 (05) : 616 - 621
  • [9] Patient perspectives on quality of care for depression and anxiety in primary health care teams: A qualitative study
    Ashcroft, Rachelle
    Menear, Matthew
    Greenblatt, Andrea
    Silveira, Jose
    Dahrouge, Simone
    Sunderji, Nadiya
    Emode, Monica
    Booton, Jocelyn
    Muchenje, Marvelous
    Cooper, Rachel
    Haughton, Asante
    McKenzie, Kwame
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (04) : 1168 - 1177
  • [10] Communication barriers to patient education in cardiac inpatient care: A qualitative study of multiple perspectives
    Farahani, Mansoureh A.
    Sahragard, Roghiyeh
    Carroll, Jennifer K.
    Mohammadi, Eesa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (03) : 322 - 328