Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients

被引:66
作者
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Wei Keith [1 ,3 ]
Lehovsky, Katie [4 ]
Debiram-Beecham, Irene [1 ]
Nuckcheddy, Tara [1 ]
Moist, Susan [5 ]
Kadri, Sudarshan [6 ]
di Pietro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Boussioutas, Alex [7 ,8 ]
Shaheen, Nicholas J. [5 ]
Katzka, David A. [9 ]
Dellon, Evan S. [5 ]
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, MRC Canc Unit, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, England
[2] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Clin Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cambridge Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Ctr Esophageal Dis & Swallowing, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Univ Hosp Leicester, Dept Gastroenterol, Leicester, Leics, England
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Australia Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Medical Device; Acceptability of Healthcare; Safety; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; INCREASING INCIDENCE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; GRADE DYSPLASIA; BRITISH SOCIETY; ADVERSE EVENTS; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have become emerging public health issues. Cytosponge is a novel, minimally invasive esophageal cell collection device. We aimed to assess the data on safety and acceptability of this device. METHODS: We performed a patient-level review of 5 prospective trials assessing Cytosponge performance in patients with reflux disease, BE and EoE in primary and secondary care. Acceptability of Cytosponge and subsequent endoscopy were recorded with visual analogue scale (VAS), wherein 0 and 10 denoted lowest and highest acceptability. Median VAS scores were compared using a Mann-Whitney test. The number of attempts, failures in swallowing the device and occurrence of adverse events were analyzed. Risk factors for failure in swallowing were analyzed using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: In total, 2672 Cytosponge procedures were performed, in 2418 individuals from 2008 through 2017. There were 2 adverse events related to the device: a minor pharyngeal bleed and a case of detachment (<1:2000). The median acceptability score for the Cytosponge was 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-8.0), which was higher than the score for endoscopy without sedation (median 5.0; IQR, 3.0-7.0; P < .001) and lower than the score for endoscopy with sedation (median 8.0; IQR, 5.0-9.0; P < .001). Nearly all patients (91.1%) successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, most on the first attempt (90.1%). Failure to swallow the device was more likely to occur in secondary care (odds ratio, 5.13; 95% CI, 1.48-17.79; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The Cytosponge test is a safe procedure with good acceptability ratings in a variety of health care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience [J].
Agostoni, Massimo ;
Fanti, Lorella ;
Gemma, Marco ;
Pasculli, Nicola ;
Beretta, Luigi ;
Testoni, Pier Alberto .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (02) :266-275
[2]   Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy [J].
Ben-Menachem, Tamir ;
Decker, G. Anton ;
Early, Dayna S. ;
Evans, Jerry ;
Fanelli, Robert D. ;
Fisher, Deborah A. ;
Fisher, Laurel ;
Fukami, Norio ;
Hwang, Joo Ha ;
Ikenberry, Steven O. ;
Jain, Rajeev ;
Jue, Terry L. ;
Khan, Khalid M. ;
Krinsky, Mary L. ;
Malpas, Phyllis M. ;
Maple, John T. ;
Sharaf, Ravi N. ;
Dominitz, Jason A. ;
Cash, Brooks D. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (04) :707-718
[3]   Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline [J].
Birk, Michael ;
Bauerfeind, Peter ;
Deprez, Pierre H. ;
Haefner, Michael ;
Hartmann, Dirk ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Hucl, Tomas ;
Lesur, Gilles ;
Aabakken, Lars ;
Meining, Alexander .
ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (05) :489-496
[4]   The Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Coleman, Helen G. ;
Xie, Shao-Hua ;
Lagergren, Jesper .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (02) :390-405
[5]   Increasing incidence of Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study [J].
Coleman, Helen G. ;
Bhat, Shivaram ;
Murray, Liam J. ;
McManus, Damian ;
Gavin, Anna T. ;
Johnston, Brian T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 26 (09) :739-745
[6]   Epidemiology and Natural History of Eosinophilic Esophagitis [J].
Dellon, Evan S. ;
Hirano, Ikuo .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (02) :319-+
[7]   Revised British Society of Gastroenterology recommendation on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus with low-grade dysplasia [J].
di Pietro, Massimiliano ;
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. .
GUT, 2018, 67 (02) :392-U256
[8]   British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus [J].
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. ;
di Pietro, Massimiliano ;
Ragunath, Krish ;
Ang, Yeng ;
Kang, Jin-Yong ;
Watson, Peter ;
Trudgill, Nigel ;
Patel, Praful ;
Kaye, Philip V. ;
Sanders, Scott ;
O'Donovan, Maria ;
Bird-Lieberman, Elizabeth ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Jankowski, Janusz A. ;
Attwood, Stephen ;
Parsons, Simon L. ;
Loft, Duncan ;
Lagergren, Jesper ;
Moayyedi, Paul ;
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios ;
de Caestecker, John .
GUT, 2014, 63 (01) :7-42
[9]   Acceptability of the Cytosponge procedure for detecting Barrett's oesophagus: a qualitative study [J].
Freeman, Madeleine ;
Offman, Judith ;
Walter, Fiona M. ;
Sasieni, Peter ;
Smith, Samuel G. .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03)
[10]   Eosinophilic Esophagitis [J].
Furuta, Glenn T. ;
Katzka, David A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (17) :1640-1648