Comparison of the Accuracy of Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring by Spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue® with Automated Laboratory Hemoglobin Measurement

被引:127
作者
Lamhaut, Lionel [1 ,2 ]
Apriotesei, Roxana [1 ,2 ]
Combes, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Lejay, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Carli, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Vivien, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, AP HP, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, F-75730 Paris 15, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
关键词
PROSPECTIVE BLOOD-DONORS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; AGREEMENT; CAPILLARY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182270c22
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The reference method for hemoglobin concentration measurement remains automated analysis in the laboratory. Although point-of-care devices such as the HemoCue (R) 201 + (HemoCue, Angelholm, Sweden) provide immediate hemoglobin values, a noninvasive, spectrophotometry-based technology (Radical-7 (R); Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) that provides continuous online hemoglobin (SpHb) measurements has been introduced. This clinical study aimed to test the hypothesis that SpHb monitoring was equivalent to that of HemoCue (R) (the automated hemoglobin measurement in the laboratory taken as a reference method) during acute surgical hemorrhage. Methods: Blood for laboratory analysis was sampled after induction of anesthesia, during surgery according to the requirements of the anesthesiologist, and finally after the transfer of the patient to the recovery room. When each blood sample was taken, capillary samples were obtained for analysis with HemoCue (R). SpHb monitoring was performed continuously during surgery. Using the automated hemoglobin measurement in the laboratory as a reference method, the authors tested the hypothesis that SpHb monitoring is equivalent to that of HemoCue (R). The agreement between two methods was evaluated by linear regression and Bland and Altman analysis. Results: Eighty-five simultaneous measurements from SpHb, HemoCue (R), and the laboratory were obtained from 44 patients. Bland and Altman comparison of SpHb and HemoCue (R) with the laboratory measurement showed, respectively, bias of -0.02 +/- 1.39 g . dl(-1) and -0.17 +/- 1.05 g . dl(-1), and a precision of 1.11 +/- 0.83 g . dl(-1) and 0.67 +/- 0.83 g . dl(-1). Considering an acceptable difference of +/- 1.0 g . dl(-1) with the laboratory measurement, the percentage of outliers was significantly higher for SpHb than for HemoCue (R) (46% vs. 16%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Taking automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement as a reference, the study shows that SpHb monitoring with Radical-7 (R) gives lower readings than does the HemoCue (R) for assessment of hemoglobin concentration during hemorrhagic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 554
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Produits de Sante (AFSSAPS), 2002, Transfus Clin Biol, V9, P333
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fed Regist, V57, P7002
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1967, BRIT HAEMAL, V13, P71
[4]   Complications related to blood transfusion in surgical patients:: data from the French national survey on anesthesia-related deaths [J].
Auroy, Yves ;
Lienhart, Andre ;
Pequignot, Francoise ;
Benhamou, Dan .
TRANSFUSION, 2007, 47 (02) :184S-189S
[5]   Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual [J].
Bland, J. Martin ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :571-582
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   IMPROVED STRATEGY FOR SCREENING PROSPECTIVE BLOOD-DONORS FOR ANEMIA [J].
BOULTON, FE ;
NIGHTINGALE, MJ ;
REYNOLDS, W .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 1994, 4 (03) :221-225
[8]   HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION IN BLOOD-DONORS [J].
CABLE, RG .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 1995, 9 (02) :131-144
[9]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE HEMOCUE HEMOGLOBINOMETER USING CAPILLARY, VENOUS AND ARTERIAL SAMPLES [J].
CHEN, PP ;
SHORT, TG ;
LEUNG, DHY ;
OH, TE .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1992, 20 (04) :497-500
[10]   Measurement of haemoglobin using single drops of skin puncture blood: is precision acceptable? [J].
Conway, AM ;
Hinchliffe, RF ;
Earland, J ;
Anderson, LM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :248-250