Harmonized outcome measures for use in atrial fibrillation patient registries and clinical practice Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees

被引:18
作者
Calkins, Hugh [1 ]
Gliklich, Richard E. [2 ,11 ]
Leavy, Michelle B. [2 ]
Piccini, Jonathan P. [3 ,4 ]
Hsu, Jonathan C. [5 ]
Mohanty, Sanghamitra [6 ]
Lewis, William [7 ]
Nazarian, Saman [8 ]
Turakhia, Mintu P. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] OM1 Inc, 800 Boylston St,Suite 1410, Boston, MA 02199 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Sulpizio Cardiovasc Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[6] St Davids Med Ctr, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Inst, Austin, TX USA
[7] Case Western Reserve Univ, MetroHlth Syst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[8] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Stanford, CA USA
[10] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Common data element; Data standard; Harmonization; Outcome measure; Patient outcome; Patient registry; ASSOCIATION TASK-FORCE; KEY DATA ELEMENTS; INFORMED TREATMENT; WRITING COMMITTEE; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; DATA STANDARDS; END-POINTS; DEFINITIONS; RATIONALE; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice. METHODS AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings. RESULTS One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E3 / E16
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CIRCULATION, DOI DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AHRQ PUBLICATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], HEART RHYTHM, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012
[4]  
[Anonymous], AGENCY HEALTHCARE RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], HRS HEART RHYTHM 201
[6]   2013 ACCF/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Measuring the Clinical Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Coronary Artery Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Acute Coronary Syndromes and Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Data Standards) [J].
Cannon, Christopher P. ;
Brindis, Ralph G. ;
Chaitman, Bernard R. ;
Cohen, David J. ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Drozda, Joseph P., Jr. ;
Fesmire, Francis M. ;
Fintel, Dan J. ;
Fonarow, Gregg C. ;
Fox, Keith A. ;
Gray, Darryl T. ;
Harrington, Robert A. ;
Hicks, Karen A. ;
Hollander, Judd E. ;
Krumholz, Harlan ;
Labarthe, Darwin R. ;
Long, Janet B. ;
Mascette, Alice M. ;
Meyer, Connie ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Radford, Martha J. ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Richmann, James B. ;
Selker, Harry P. ;
Shahian, David M. ;
Shaw, Richard E. ;
Sprenger, Sharon ;
Swor, Robert ;
Underberg, James A. ;
de Werf, Frans Van ;
Weiner, Bonnie H. ;
Weintraub, William S. .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (09) :1052-1089
[7]   Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study [J].
Chugh, Sumeet S. ;
Havmoeller, Rasmus ;
Narayanan, Kumar ;
Singh, David ;
Rienstra, Michiel ;
Benjamin, Emelia J. ;
Gillum, Richard F. ;
Kim, Young-Hoon ;
McAnulty, John H. ;
Zheng, Zhi-Jie ;
Forouzanfar, Mohammad H. ;
Naghavi, Mohsen ;
Mensah, George A. ;
Ezzati, Majid ;
Murray, Christopher J. L. .
CIRCULATION, 2014, 129 (08) :837-847
[8]   Estimates of Current and Future Incidence and Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in the US Adult Population [J].
Colilla, Susan ;
Crow, Ann ;
Petkun, William ;
Singer, Daniel E. ;
Simon, Teresa ;
Liu, Xianchen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 112 (08) :1142-1147
[9]  
Gliklich RE, 2014, J COMP EFFECT RES, V3, P473, DOI [10.2217/cer.14.38, 10.2217/CER.14.38]
[10]   Health-related quality of life questionnaires: an important method to evaluate patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation [J].
Ha, Andrew C. T. ;
Dorian, Paul .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (02) :177-184