Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Sector

被引:49
作者
Lapuente, Victor [1 ,2 ]
Suzuki, Kohei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] ESADE Business Sch, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Fac Governance & Global Affairs, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CIVIL-SERVANTS; MANAGEMENT; DIFFUSION; ADOPTION; GOVERNMENT; AMERICAN; STATE; ORGANIZATIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13175
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Previous studies have identified institutional, organizational, and individual factors that promote innovation in public organizations. Yet they have overlooked how the type of public administration-and the type of administrators-is associated with innovative attitudes. Using two large, unique comparative data sets on public bureaucracies and public managers, this article examines how bureaucratic politicization and legalistic features are associated with senior public managers' attitudes toward innovation in 19 European countries. Results of multilevel analysis indicate that the bureaucratic politicization of an administration and the law background of public managers matter. Public managers working in politicized administrations and those whose education includes a law degree exhibit lower pro-innovation attitudes (i.e., receptiveness to new ideas and creative solutions and change orientation).
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 467
页数:14
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Auer Astrid., 1996, CIVIL SERVICES EUROP
[2]   DO EMPLOYEES BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY IN PUBLIC- VS PRIVATE-SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS? A state-of-the-art review [J].
Baarspul, Hayo C. ;
Wilderom, Celeste P. M. .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 13 (07) :967-1002
[3]   Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations [J].
Balla, SJ .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (03) :221-245
[4]  
Bekke A. J. G. M., 2000, Civil service systems in Western Europe
[5]   INNOVATION OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT - THE ADOPTION OF STRATEGIC-PLANNING [J].
BERRY, FS .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1994, 54 (04) :322-330
[6]  
BIBLE J, 2016, LEGAL BUSINESS 1006
[7]   Public sector innovation-From theory to measurement [J].
Bloch, Carter ;
Bugge, Markus M. .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 27 :133-145
[8]   Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers [J].
Borins, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2000, 60 (06) :498-507
[9]   Explaining the adoption of innovation: an empirical analysis of public management reform [J].
Boyne, GA ;
Gould-Williams, JS ;
Law, J ;
Walker, RM .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2005, 23 (03) :419-435
[10]  
Brehm J.O., 1997, Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public