Intraday volatility in interest-rate and foreign-exchange markets: ARCH, announcement, and seasonality effects

We explore the determinants of intraday volatility in interest-rate and foreign-exchange markets, focusing on the importance and interaction of three types of information in predicting intraday volatility: (a) knowledge of recent past volatilities (i.e., ARCH or Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity effects); (b) prior knowledge of when major scheduled macroeconomic announcements, such as the employment report or Producer Price Index, will he released; and (c) knowledge of seasonality patterns. We find that all three information sets have significant incremental predictive power, but macroeconomic announcements are the most important determinants of periods of very high intraday volatility (particularly in the interest-rate markets). We show that because the three information sets are not independent, it is necessary to simultaneously consider all three to accurately measure intraday volatility patterns. For instance, we find that most of the previously documented time-of-day and day-of-the-week volatility patterns in these markets are due to the tendency for macroeconomic announcements to occur on particular days and at particular times. Indeed. the familiar U-shape completely disappears in the foreign-exchange market. We also find that estimates of ARCH effects are Considerably altered when we account for announcement effects and return periodicity; specifically estimates of volatility persistence are sharply reduced. Separately our results show that high volatility persists longer after shocks due to unscheduled announcements than after equivalent shocks due to scheduled announcements, indicating that market participants digest information much more quickly if they are prepared to receive it. However, contrary to results from equity markets, we find no evidence of a meaningful difference in volatility persistence after positive or negative price shocks. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fur Mark 21: 517-552, 2001.