Comparison of Earth Observing-1 ALI and Landsat ETM+ for crop identification and yield prediction in Mexico

被引:32
作者
Lobell, DB [1 ]
Asner, GP
机构
[1] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Geol & Environm Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2003年 / 41卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Advanced Land Imager (ALI); Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); remote sensing;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2003.812909
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparison of Earth Observing 1 (EO-1) Advanced Land Imager (ALI) and Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) images collected over an agricultural region in northwest Mexico. Across 115 fields with a range of cover types, radiance measurements collected by ALI were within 3% of ETM+ for all five common bands. Crop discrimination was significantly improved with ALI compared to ETM+, with an increase from 85% to 95% accuracy for distinguishing maize from wheat fields. This improvement was attributed to the greater SNR in ALI, as well as the unique information content of ALI band 4p (0.84-0.89 mum), which may be due to sensitivity to canopy water content. Yield predictions from reflectance-calibrated data did not reveal significant differences between the sensors. The greatest distinction between ALI and ETM+ was observed in the panchromatic band, with ALI providing more detailed information on inter- and intrafield radiance differences, which show promise for precision agriculture applications. We conclude that ALI meets or exceeds ETM+ performance for agricultural applications evaluated here, thus providing a plausible option for continuity of the valuable Landsat record.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1282
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bausch WC, 1996, T ASAE, V39, P1869, DOI 10.13031/2013.27665
[2]   Modelling the effect of the spatial distribution of agricultural practices on nitrogen fluxes in rural catchments [J].
Beaujouan, V ;
Durand, P ;
Ruiz, L .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2001, 137 (01) :93-105
[3]   SPECTRAL ESTIMATES OF ABSORBED RADIATION AND PHYTOMASS PRODUCTION IN CORN AND SOYBEAN CANOPIES [J].
DAUGHTRY, CST ;
GALLO, KP ;
GOWARD, SN ;
PRINCE, SD ;
KUSTAS, WP .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 39 (02) :141-152
[4]   Precision and accuracy of EO-1 Advanced Land Imager (ALI) data for semiarid vegetation studies [J].
Elmore, AJ ;
Mustard, JF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (06) :1311-1320
[5]   NDWI - A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space [J].
Gao, BC .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 58 (03) :257-266
[6]   SIGNATURE-EXTENDIBLE TECHNOLOGY - GLOBAL SPACE-BASED CROP RECOGNITION [J].
HALL, FG ;
BADHWAR, GD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1987, 25 (01) :93-103
[7]  
JACKSON RD, 1984, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INST, V475, P81
[8]  
Lillesand T.M., 2000, REMOTE SENSING IMAGE, V4th
[9]   Remote sensing of regional crop production in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico: estimates and uncertainties [J].
Lobell, DB ;
Asner, GP ;
Ortiz-Monasterio, JI ;
Benning, TL .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 94 (02) :205-220
[10]   Satellite estimates of productivity and light use efficiency in United States agriculture, 1982-98 [J].
Lobell, DB ;
Hicke, JA ;
Asner, GP ;
Field, CB ;
Tucker, CJ ;
Los, SO .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2002, 8 (08) :722-735