Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation Clinical article

被引:95
作者
Aoki, Yasuchika [1 ]
Yamagata, Masatsune [1 ]
Nakajima, Fumitake [1 ]
Ikeda, Yoshikazu [1 ]
Smmizu, Koh [1 ]
Yoshihara, Masakazu [1 ]
Iwasaki, Junichi [1 ]
Toyone, Tomoaki [3 ]
Nakagawa, Koichi [2 ]
Nakajima, Arata [4 ]
Takahashi, Kazuhisa [2 ]
Ohtori, Seiji [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiba, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Grad Sch Med, Chiba, Japan
[3] Teikyo Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiba Med Ctr, Chiba, Japan
[4] Chiba Aoba Municipal Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiba, Japan
关键词
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; cage migration; risk factor; unilateral pedicle screw fixation; ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTABILITY;
D O I
10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09590
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Because the authors encountered 4 cases of hardware migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, a retrospective study was conducted to identify factors influencing the posterior migration of fusion cages. Methods. Patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (125 individuals; 144 disc levels) were treated using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and followed for 12-33 inonths. Medical records and pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed, and factors influencing the incidence of cage migration were analyzed. Results. Postoperative cage migration was found in 4 patients at or before 3 months. Because all the cages that migrated postoperatively were bullet-shaped (Capstone), only these cages were analyzed. The analysis of preoperative radiographs revealed that higher posterior disc height ([PDH] 6 mm) significantly increased the incidence of postoperative cage migration, but percent slippage, translation, range of motion, and Cobb angle did not. The incidence of cage migration in patients with unilateral fixation (3 [8.3%] of 36) was not significantly different from that in patients with bilateral fixation (1 [2.1%] of 48). Patients who had scoliotic curvature with a Cobb angle > 10 when treated with unilateral fixation demonstrated a tendency to have more frequent postoperative cage migration than patients treated with bilateral fixation. To examine the influence of the height of fusion cages, a value obtained by subtracting preoperative anterior disc height (ADH) or PDH from cage height was defined as "Cage height-ADH" (or "Cage height PDH"). The analysis revealed that the value for "Cage height ADH" as well as "Cage height PDH" was significantly lower in migrated levels than in nonmigrated levels, suggesting that the choice of undersized cages may increase the incidence of cage migration. Conclusions. The results suggest that the use of a bullet-shaped cage, higher PDH, the presence of scoliotic curvature, and undersized fusion cages are possible risk factors for cage migration. One patient with postoperative cage migration following bilateral screw fixation underwent revision surgery, and the pedicle screw fixation was found to be disrupted. Other than in this patient, cage migration occurred only in those treated by unilateral fixation. The potential for postoperative cage migration and limitations of unilateral fixation should be considered by spine surgeons. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09590)
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Posterior Migration of Fusion Cages in Degenerative Lumbar Disease Treated With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Report of Three Patients [J].
Aoki, Yasuchika ;
Yamagata, Masatsune ;
Nakajima, Fumitake ;
Ikeda, Yoshikazu ;
Takahashi, Kazuhisa .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) :E54-E58
[2]  
Beringer Will F, 2006, Neurosurg Focus, V20, pE4
[3]   TREATMENT OF SEVERE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS BY REDUCTION AND PEDICULAR FIXATION - A 4-6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
BOOS, N ;
MARCHESI, D ;
ZUBER, K ;
AEBI, M .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (12) :1655-1661
[4]  
Brantigan John W, 2003, Spine J, V3, P186, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00536-3
[5]   Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages [J].
Chen, L ;
Yang, HL ;
Tang, TS .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (19) :2171-2175
[6]  
deLoubresse CG, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P194
[7]  
Humphreys SC, 2001, SPINE, V26, P567
[8]   Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms - Which is the more critical factor for symptoms: Sogittal translation or segment angulation? [J].
Iguchi, T ;
Kanemura, A ;
Kasahara, K ;
Sato, K ;
Kurihara, A ;
Yoshiya, S ;
Nishida, K ;
Miyamoto, H ;
Doita, M .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (04) :284-290
[9]   Intraoperative biomechanical assessment of lumbar spinal instability: Validation of radiographic parameters indicating anterior column support in lumbar spinal fusion [J].
Kanayama, M ;
Hashimoto, T ;
Shigenobu, K ;
Oha, F ;
Ishida, T ;
Yamane, S .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (20) :2368-2372
[10]   In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages [J].
Kettler, A ;
Schmoelz, W ;
Kast, E ;
Gottwald, M ;
Claes, L ;
Wilke, HJ .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (22) :E665-E670