Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting

被引:60
作者
Gramling, Robert [1 ]
Stanek, Susan [1 ]
Ladwig, Susan [1 ]
Gajary-Coots, Elizabeth [1 ]
Cimino, Jenica [2 ]
Anderson, Wendy [2 ]
Norton, Sally A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Quality improvement; quality indicators; palliative care; communication; quality of care; COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIANS; HOSPICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.018
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. As endorsed by the palliative care "Measuring What Matters'' initiative, capturing patients' direct assessment of their care is essential for ongoing quality reporting and improvement. Fostering an environment where seriously ill patients feel heard and understood is of crucial importance to modern health care. Objectives. To describe the development and performance of a self-report field measure for seriously ill patients to report how well they feel heard and understood in the hospital environment. Methods. As part of a larger ongoing cohort study of inpatient palliative care, we developed and administered the following point-of-care item: "Over the past two days, how much have you felt heard and understood by the doctors, nurses and hospital staff?'' (completely, quite a bit, moderately, slightly, not at all). Participants completed the measure before and the day after palliative care consultation. For the postconsultation version, we changed the time frame from "past two days'' to "today.'' Results. One hundred sixty patients with advanced cancer completed the preconsultation assessment, and 87% of them completed the postconsultation version. Responses encompassed full use of the ordinal scale, did not exhibit ceiling or floor effects, and showed improvement from preassessment to postassessment. The item was quick to administer and easy for patients to complete. Conclusion. The "Heard & Understood'' item is a promising self-report quality measure for the inpatient palliative care setting. (C) 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP Charts and the SF-36 [J].
Bronfort, G ;
Bouter, LM .
PAIN, 1999, 83 (02) :201-209
[2]   THE NATURE OF SUFFERING AND THE GOALS OF MEDICINE [J].
CASSEL, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 306 (11) :639-645
[3]   Diagnosing suffering: A perspective [J].
Cassell, EJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (07) :531-534
[4]   Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers [J].
Chochinov, Harvey Max ;
McClement, Susan ;
Hack, Thomas ;
Thompson, Genevieve ;
Dufault, Brenden ;
Harlos, Mike .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 (06) :974-+
[5]   Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement [J].
Dy, Sydney Morss ;
Herr, Keela ;
Bernacki, Rachelle E. ;
Kamal, Arif H. ;
Walling, Anne M. ;
Ersek, Mary ;
Norton, Sally A. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) :155-162
[6]   Measuring What Matters: Top-Ranked Quality Indicators for Hospice and Palliative Care From the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association [J].
Dy, Sydney Morss ;
Kiley, Kasey B. ;
Ast, Katherine ;
Lupu, Dale ;
Norton, Sally A. ;
McMillan, Susan C. ;
Herr, Keela ;
Rotella, Joseph D. ;
Casarett, David J. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 (04) :773-781
[7]   Collaborative deliberation: A model for patient care [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Lloyd, Amy ;
May, Carl ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Stiggelbout, Anne ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Frosch, Dominick L. ;
Rapley, Tim ;
Barr, Paul ;
Walsh, Thom ;
Grande, Stuart W. ;
Montori, Victor ;
Epstein, Ronald .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 97 (02) :158-164
[8]  
Epstein R. M., 2007, PATIENT CENTERED COM, DOI [10.1037/e481972008-001, DOI 10.1037/E481972008-001]
[9]   What Is Shared in Shared Decision Making? Complex Decisions When the Evidence Is Unclear [J].
Epstein, Ronald M. ;
Gramling, Robert E. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 :94S-112S
[10]   Authoritarian Physicians And Patients' Fear Of Being Labeled 'Difficult' Among Key Obstacles To Shared Decision Making [J].
Frosch, Dominick L. ;
May, Suepattra G. ;
Rendle, Katharine A. S. ;
Tietbohl, Caroline ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (05) :1030-1038