The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory tests

被引:61
作者
Hamilton, M
Rajaram, S
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] CUNY, Baruch Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jmla.2000.2749
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Four experiments were conducted to examine the concreteness effect ill implicit and explicit memory measures. Experiment 1 replicated prior reports of an imagery effect on an implicit conceptual memory test. In Experiment 2. we confirmed our prediction of conceptual sensitivity of free recall, explicit general knowledge, explicit word fragment completion, and the implicit general knowledge tests with a levels of processing manipulation. Furthermore, although we obtained the concreteness effect (better memory for concrete than abstract nouns) in free recall and we explicit general knowledge test, we failed to find this effect in the implicit general knowledge test. Experiment 3 revealed that the failure to iind the concreteness effect on the implicit general knowledge test was not attributable to combining two encoding manipulations in Experiment 2. In Experiment 4. we ruled out the possibility that the failure to find the concreteness effect in conceptual implicit memory may be related to the number of meaningful associates for targets, We discuss the implications of these findings within the context of the transfer appropriate processing framework (Roediger, Weldon, & Challis, 1989) and the dual-code hypothesis (Paivio, 1971, 1991) of memory. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 117
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Aron A., 2003, STAT PSYCHOL, V3rd
[2]   INVESTIGATING DISSOCIATIONS AMONG MEMORY MEASURES - SUPPORT FOR A TRANSFER-APPROPRIATE PROCESSING FRAMEWORK [J].
BLAXTON, TA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (04) :657-668
[3]   A DISSOCIATION BETWEEN 2 IMPLICIT CONCEPTUAL TESTS SUPPORTS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TYPES OF CONCEPTUAL PROCESSING [J].
CABEZA, R .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (04) :505-508
[4]   DISSOCIATIVE EFFECT OF MASSED REPETITION ON IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF MEMORY [J].
CHALLIS, BH ;
SIDHU, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (01) :115-127
[5]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[6]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[7]   TEST DIFFERENCES IN ACCESSING BILINGUAL MEMORY [J].
DURGUNOGLU, AY ;
ROEDIGER, HL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1987, 26 (04) :377-391
[8]   IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY FOR NEW ASSOCIATIONS IN NORMAL AND AMNESIC SUBJECTS [J].
GRAF, P ;
SCHACTER, DL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1985, 11 (03) :501-518
[9]   LEVEL-OF-PROCESSING EFFECTS IN CONCEPTUALLY DRIVEN IMPLICIT TASKS [J].
HAMANN, SB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (06) :970-977
[10]  
Madigan S., 1983, IMAGERY MEMORY COGNI