Performance of Ventilators Compatible With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Bench Study

被引:7
作者
Chikata, Yusuke [1 ]
Okuda, Nao [2 ]
Izawa, Masayo [2 ]
Onodera, Mutsuo [2 ]
Nishimura, Masaji [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ Hosp, Med Equipment Ctr, Tokushima, Japan
[2] Univ Tokushima, Emergency & Crit Care Med, Grad Sch, Tokushima 7708503, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; MRI-compatible ventilator; TRANSPORT; ANESTHETIST;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.03528
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indispensable for diagnosing brain and spinal cord abnormalities. Magnetic components cannot be used during MRI procedures; therefore, patient support equipment must use MRI-compatible materials. However, little is known of the performance of MRI-compatible ventilators. METHODS: At commonly used settings, we tested the delivered tidal volume (V-T), F-IO2, PEEP, and operation of the high-inspiratory-pressure-relief valves of 4 portable MRI-compatible ventilators (Pneupac VR1, ParaPAC 200DMRI, CAREvent MRI, iVent201) and one ICU ventilator (Servo-i). Each ventilator was set in volume control/continuous mandatory ventilation mode. Breathing frequency and V-T were tested at 10 breaths/min and 300, 500, and 700 mL, respectively. The Pneupac VR1 has fixed V-T and frequency combinations, so it was tested at V-T = 300 mL and 20 breaths/min, V-T = 500 mL and 12 breaths/min, and V-T = 800 mL and 10 breaths/min. F-IO2, was 0.6 and 1.0. At the air-mix setting, F-IO2 was fixed at 0.5 with the Pneupac VR1, 0.45 with the ParaPAC 200DMRI, and 0.6 with the CAREvent MRI. PEEP was set at 5 and 10 cm H2O, and pressure relief was set at 30 and 40 cm H2O. RESULTS: V-T error varied widely among ventilators (-28.1 to 25.5%). As V-T increased, error decreased with the Pneupac VR1, ParaPAC 200DMRI, and CAREvent MRI (P < .05). F-IO2 error ranged from 13.3 to 25.3% at 0.6 (or air mix). PEEP error varied among ventilators (-29.2 to 42.5%). Only the Servo-i maintained V-T, F-IO2 and PEEP at set levels. The pressure-relief valves worked in all ventilators. CONCLUSIONS: None of the MRI-compatible ventilators maintained V-T, F-IO2, and PEEP at set levels. Vital signs of patients with unstable respiratory mechanics should be monitored during transport and MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Evaluation of 4 New Generation Portable Ventilators
    Blakeman, Thomas C.
    Branson, Richard D.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2013, 58 (02) : 264 - 272
  • [2] Bench Evaluation of 7 Home-Care Ventilators
    Blakeman, Thomas C.
    Rodriquez, Dario
    Hanseman, Dennis
    Branson, Richard D.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2011, 56 (11) : 1791 - 1798
  • [3] Evaluation of Ventilators Used During Transport of Critically Ill Patients: A Bench Study
    Boussen, Salah
    Gainnier, Marc
    Michelet, Pierre
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2013, 58 (11) : 1911 - 1922
  • [4] Chipman DW, 2007, RESP CARE, V52, P740
  • [5] Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation
    Lyazidi, Aissam
    Thille, Arnaud W.
    Carteaux, Guillaume
    Galia, Fabrice
    Brochard, Laurent
    Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (12) : 2074 - 2080
  • [6] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE FOR THE ANESTHETIST .1. PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES, APPLICATIONS, SAFETY ASPECTS
    MENON, DK
    PEDEN, CJ
    HALL, AS
    SARGENTONI, J
    WHITWAM, JG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (03) : 240 - 255
  • [7] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE FOR THE ANESTHETIST .2. ANESTHESIA AND MONITORING IN MR UNITS
    PEDEN, CJ
    MENON, DK
    HALL, AS
    SARGENTONI, J
    WHITWAM, JG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (06) : 508 - 517
  • [8] Testing of adult and paediatric ventilators for use in a magnetic resonance imaging unit
    Williams, EJ
    Jones, NS
    Carpenter, TA
    Bunch, CS
    Menon, DK
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (10) : 969 - 974
  • [9] Evaluation of ventilators used during transport of ICU patients -: a bench study
    Zanetta, G
    Robert, D
    Guérin, C
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (04) : 443 - 451