Optimization of Linezolid Dosing Regimens for Treatment of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Infection

被引:13
作者
Santimaleeworagun, Wichai [1 ,2 ]
Changpradub, Dhitiwat [3 ]
Hemapanpairoa, Jatapat [2 ,4 ]
Thunyaharn, Sudaluck [5 ]
机构
[1] Silpakorn Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand
[2] Antibiot Optimizat & Patient Care Project Pharmac, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[3] Phramongkutklao Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Burapha Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharmaceut Care, Chon Buri, Thailand
[5] Nakhonratchasima Coll, Fac Med Technol, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
关键词
Enterococcus faecium; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Monte Carlo simulation; Thrombocytopenia; GRAM-POSITIVE COCCI; DRUG; OUTCOMES; PHARMACODYNAMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TIGECYCLINE; DAPTOMYCIN; MECHANISMS; EMERGENCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3947/ic.2021.0034
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, is recommended for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). However, 100% free-drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) and an area under the curve of free drug to MIC ratio ( fAUC24/MIC) >100 were associated with favorable clinical outcome with less emerging resistance. A plasma trough concentration (C-trough) of linezolid >= 9 mu g/mL was also related to hematologic toxicity. Thus, linezolid dose optimization is needed for VRE treatment. The study aimed to determine the in vitro linezolid activity against clinical VRE isolates and linezolid dosing regimens in critically ill patients who met the target pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for VRE treatment. Materials and Methods: Enterococcal isolates from enterococcal-infected patients were obtained between 2014 and 2018 at Phramongkutklao Hospital. We used Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the probability of target attainment, and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the free area under the curve to MIC ratio (fAUIC(24)) was used to calculate the fAUC(24)/MIC 80 - 100 and fT/MIC >85 - 100% of the interval time of administration for clinical response and microbiological eradication as well as the Ctrough >= 9 mu g/mL for the probability of hematologic toxicity. Results: For linezolid MIC determination, the MIC median (MIC50), MIC for 90% growth (MIC90), and range for linezolid were 1.5 mu g/mL, 2 mu g/mL, and 0.72 - 2 mu g/mL, respectively. A dosing regimen of 1,200 mg either once daily or as a divided dose every 12 h gave target attainments of fAUC24/MICs >80 and >100, which exceeded 90% for MICs <= 1 and <= 1 mu g/mL, respectively, with a rate of hematologic toxicity <15%. If the expected fT>MICs were >85% and 100%, a 1,200-mg divided dose every 12 h could cover VRE isolates having linezolid MICs <= 1 mu g/mL and <= 0.75 mu g/mL. Even 600 mg every 8 h and 1,200 mg as a continuous infusion gave a higher target attainment of fAUC24/ MIC and a fT>MIC and the target CFR, but those regimens gave C-trough >= 9 mu g/mL rates of 40.7% and 99.6%. Conclusion: The current dosing of 1,200 mg/day might be optimal treatment for infection by VRE isolates with documented MICs <= 1 mu g/mL. For treatment of VRE with a MIC of 2 mu g/mL or to achieve the target CFR, the use of linezolid with other antibiotic combinations might help achieve the PK/PD target, provide better clinical outcome, and prevent resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 511
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Linezolid pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile in critically ill septic patients: intermittent versus continuous infusion [J].
Adembri, Chiara ;
Fallani, Stefania ;
Cassetta, Maria Iris ;
Arrigucci, Silvia ;
Ottaviano, Alessandra ;
Pecile, Patrizia ;
Mazzei, Teresita ;
De Gaudio, Raffaele ;
Novelli, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2008, 31 (02) :122-129
[2]  
Ager Sally, 2012, Infect Drug Resist, V5, P87, DOI 10.2147/IDR.S25890
[3]   Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: A Review of Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Perspectives of Human and Animal Health [J].
Ahmed, Mohamed O. ;
Baptiste, Keith E. .
MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2018, 24 (05) :590-606
[4]   Impact of augmented renal clearance on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid: Advantages of continuous infusion from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective [J].
Barrasa, Helena ;
Soraluce, Amaia ;
Uson, Elena ;
Sainz, Javier ;
Martin, Alejandro ;
Angel Sanchez-Izquierdo, Jose ;
Maynar, Javier ;
Rodriguez-Gascon, Alicia ;
Isla, Arantxazu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 93 :329-338
[5]   Update on prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin in enterococci in Europe: Towards a common nomenclature [J].
Bender, Jennifer K. ;
Cattoir, Vincent ;
Hegstad, Kristin ;
Sadowy, Ewa ;
Coque, Teresa M. ;
Westh, Henrik ;
Hammerum, Anette M. ;
Schaffer, Kirsten ;
Burns, Karen ;
Murchan, Stephen ;
Novais, Carla ;
Freitas, Ana R. ;
Peixe, Luisa ;
Del Grosso, Maria ;
Pantosti, Annalisa ;
Werner, Guido .
DRUG RESISTANCE UPDATES, 2018, 40 :25-39
[6]   Pharmacokinetic/pharmaeodynamic factors influencing emergence of resistance to linezolid in an in vitro model [J].
Boak, Lauren M. ;
Li, Jian ;
Rayner, Craig R. ;
Nation, Roger L. .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 51 (04) :1287-1292
[7]   Linezolid plasma concentrations and occurrence of drug-related haematological toxicity in patients with Gram-positive infections [J].
Cattaneo, Dario ;
Orlando, Giovanna ;
Cozzi, Valeria ;
Cordier, Laura ;
Baldelli, Sara ;
Merli, Stefania ;
Fucile, Serena ;
Gulisano, Cecilia ;
Rizzardini, Giuliano ;
Clementi, Emilio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 41 (06) :586-589
[8]  
( CDC) CfDCaP, National Healthcare Safety Network: Surgical Site Infection Events
[9]   In Vitro Activities of Tedizolid and Linezolid against Gram-Positive Cocci Associated with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Pneumonia [J].
Chen, Ko-Hung ;
Huang, Yu-Tsung ;
Liao, Chun-Hsing ;
Sheng, Wang-Hui ;
Hsueh, Po-Ren .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (10) :6262-6265
[10]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2019, PERFORMANCE STANDARD, P282