A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems

被引:102
作者
Kutucuoglu, KY [1 ]
Hamali, J
Irani, Z
Sharp, JM
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
[2] Brunel Univ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[3] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
performance measurement; maintenance; quality function deployment;
D O I
10.1108/01443570110358521
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The role of maintenance in modern manufacturing is becoming ever more important, with companies adopting maintenance as a profit-generating business element. As a result, traditional terms used to describe maintenance such as "necessary evil" seem to be obsolete. It would appear that the aim of the maintenance function is to contribute towards an organisation's profit, clearly bringing the need for maintenance operations to be in harmony with corporate business objectives. As the measurement activity provides the link between the actual output and the desired results, performance measurement systems are crucial to those who have a stake in maintenance, to ensure that they are not in conflict with the overall business needs. This paper looks at the role of performance measurement systems (PMS) in maintenance, with particular reference to developing a new PMS using the quality function deployment (QFD) technique. First, a literature review on performance measurement is presented, in which the key factors for an effective PMS are identified. Second, common PMSs for maintenance are examined. Then, based on the principles of an effective PMS a discussion on PMSs is presented, when applied to the maintenance function. Next, a framework is developed to embrace these key facets, which is followed by a discussion of its practical implications, in the light of its application within a SME.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 194
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY 50 GUIDE GUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, TQM MAGAZINE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, QUALITY SERVICE
[4]  
[Anonymous], MAINTENANCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SUCCESSFULLY INSTALL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAI
[7]  
Atkinson AA, 1997, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P25
[8]  
Ben-Daya M., 1995, J QUAL MAINT ENG, V1, P20, DOI [10.1108/13552519510083110, DOI 10.1108/13552519510083110]
[9]  
Brown M.G., 1994, WHY TQM FAILS
[10]  
Chenhall R.H., 1997, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V8, P187, DOI [DOI 10.1006/MARE.1996.0038, 10.1006/mare.1996.0038]