The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data; and adjustment procedures

被引:262
作者
Huang, W. J. [1 ]
Audi, G. [1 ]
Wang, Meng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kondev, F. G. [5 ]
Naimi, S. [6 ]
Xu, Xing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CSNSM, CNRS,IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Modern Phys, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Modern Phys, Joint Dept Nucl Phys, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[5] Argonne Natl Lab, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[6] RIKEN, Nishina Ctr, Wako, Saitama 3510198, Japan
关键词
AME; trends from the mass surface (TMS); atomic-mass tables; least-squares adjustment; NUCLEAR; ENERGY; DECAY; STANDARDS; EMISSION; VALUES; STATES;
D O I
10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030002
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
This paper is the first of two articles (Part I and Part II) that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation, AME2016. It includes complete information on the experimental input data (also including unused and rejected ones), as well as details on the evaluation procedures used to derive the tables of recommended values given in the second part. This article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction, decay and mass-spectrometric results. These input values were entered in the least-squares adjustment for determining the best values for the atomic masses and their uncertainties. Details of the calculation and particularities of the AME are then described. All accepted and rejected data, including outweighted ones, are presented in a tabular format and compared with the adjusted values obtained using the least-squares fit analysis. Differences with the previous AME 2012 evaluation are discussed and specific information is presented for several cases that may be of interest to AME users. The second A me 2 0 1 6 article gives a table with the recommended values of atomic masses, as well as tables and graphs of derived quantities, along with the list of references used in both the AME 2016 and the NUBASE 2016 evaluations (the first paper in this issue).
引用
收藏
页数:344
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CRC HDB CHEM PHYS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, JPS C P
[3]   ISOBARIC MASS EQUATION FOR A = 1-45 AND SYSTEMATICS OF COULOMB DISPLACEMENT ENERGIES [J].
ANTONY, MS ;
BRITZ, J ;
BUEB, JB ;
PAPE, A .
ATOMIC DATA AND NUCLEAR DATA TABLES, 1985, 33 (03) :447-478
[4]   COULOMB DISPLACEMENT ENERGIES BETWEEN ANALOG LEVELS FOR 44 LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO A LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO 239 [J].
ANTONY, MS ;
BRITZ, J ;
PAPE, A .
ATOMIC DATA AND NUCLEAR DATA TABLES, 1988, 40 (01) :9-56
[5]   PREDICTED MASSES AND EXCITATION-ENERGIES IN HIGHER ISOSPIN MULTIPLETS FOR 9 LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO A LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO 60 [J].
ANTONY, MS ;
BRITZ, J ;
PAPE, A .
ATOMIC DATA AND NUCLEAR DATA TABLES, 1986, 34 (02) :279-299
[6]   Theoretical prediction for the ground state of 10He with the method of analytic continuation in the coupling constant -: art. no. 052501 [J].
Aoyama, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (05) :1-052501
[7]   THE 1993 ATOMIC MASS EVALUATION .4. EVALUATION OF INPUT DATA, ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURES [J].
AUDI, G ;
WAPSTRA, AH ;
DEDIEU, M .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1993, 565 (01) :193-397
[8]   The history of nuclidic masses and of their evaluation [J].
Audi, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2006, 251 (2-3) :85-94
[9]   The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures [J].
Audi, G. ;
Wang, M. ;
Wapstra, A. H. ;
Kondev, F. G. ;
MacCormick, M. ;
Xu, X. ;
Pfeiffer, B. .
CHINESE PHYSICS C, 2012, 36 (12) :1287-1602
[10]   Atomic Mass Evaluation: the Mass Tables [J].
Audi, G. ;
Wang, M. ;
Wapstra, A. H. ;
Pfeiffer, B. ;
Kondev, F. C. .
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (02) :1318-1321