An applicability assessment and sensitivity analysis of land use impact models: application of the LANCA model in site-specific conditions

被引:4
作者
Terranova, D. [1 ]
Balugani, E. [1 ]
Righi, S. [1 ,2 ]
Marazza, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Ctr Interdipartimentale Ric Sci Ambientali, CIRSA, Via S Alberto 163, I-48123 Ravenna, RA, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Phys, DiFa, Viale B Pichat 6-2, I-40123 Bologna, BO, Italy
关键词
Soil quality indicators; Land use; Impact assessment; Soil erosion; Regionalization; Spatial differentiation; RUSLE; Model applicability; Harmonised LCIA methods; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; DATASET; EROSION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-021-01981-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose In this work, we study a land use impact model with the aim of obtaining spatially differentiated as opposed to default average characterisation factors. In particular, we study the application of LANCA (R), a multi-indicator model with available country average characterisation factors expressing the alteration of the soil quality level of the current land use of one kind with respect to a reference situation. Method To this purpose, we use the LANCA (R) method documentation at a higher spatial resolution and apply all the required elemental steps. From a user perspective, we score the transparency of the method down to the basic methodological references and single out the source of errors that the user may incur when: (i) collecting the input data, (ii) selecting the appropriate soil/land classes and (iii) applying the individual calculation steps. For a greater insight, we couple the source of errors with a sensitivity analysis. Results In the comparison between a site-specific test area and the related country default values, we obtained relevant discrepancies regarding the erosion resistance and the physicochemical filtration of the soil. For example, we find that the erosion resistance potential is -1.06 * 10(-3) kg m(2) a(-1) locally while the country default value is 13.1. We explain differences through the sensitivity analysis and having analysed in depth the underpinned soil erosion equation and the critical steps for its calibration. Together with systematic errors, we find that the method generally implies 9 scarcely guided steps out of 42, and one-third of the basic methodologies are not fully explained or accessible. These factors make the results related to Biotic Production, Mechanical Filtration, Physicochemical Filtration and Groundwater Regeneration user dependent and - in this sense - difficult to replicate. Conclusions From the analysis, we distil 7 main directions for improvement addressed to LANCA (R) and soil models especially in sight of a broader application of a regionalised life cycle impact assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2231
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe [J].
Panagos, Panos ;
Borrelli, Pasquale ;
Poesen, Jean ;
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Lugato, Emanuele ;
Meusburger, Katrin ;
Montanarella, Luca ;
Alewell, Christine .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 54 :438-447
[32]   Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale [J].
Panagos, Panos ;
Borrelli, Pasquale ;
Meusburger, Katrin ;
Alewell, Christine ;
Lugato, Emanuele ;
Montanarella, Luca .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 48 :38-50
[33]   Soil erodibility in Europe: A high-resolution dataset based on LUCAS [J].
Panagos, Panos ;
Meusburger, Katrin ;
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Borrelli, Pasqualle ;
Alewell, Christine .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 479 :189-200
[34]   Regionalized LCA in practice: the need for a universal shapefile to match LCI and LCIA [J].
Pfister, Stephan ;
Oberschelp, Christopher ;
Sonderegger, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10) :1867-1871
[35]   Land use impacts on freshwater regulation, erosion regulation, and water purification: a spatial approach for a global scale level [J].
Saad, Rosie ;
Koellner, Thomas ;
Margni, Manuele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (06) :1253-1264
[36]   Assessment of land use impacts on soil ecological functions: development of spatially differentiated characterization factors within a Canadian context [J].
Saad, Rosie ;
Margni, Manuele ;
Koellner, Thomas ;
Wittstock, Bastian ;
Deschenes, Louise .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (03) :198-211
[37]  
Sala S., 2019, Suggestions for the update of the Environmental Footprint Life Cycle Impact Assessment: impacts due to resource use, water use, land use, and particulate matter
[38]   Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment [J].
Saltelli, A .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (03) :579-590
[39]   Assessing Impacts on the Natural Resource Soil in Life Cycle Assessment: Methods for Compaction and Water Erosion [J].
Sonderegger, Thomas ;
Pfister, Stephan ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (11) :6496-6507
[40]  
Thoumazeau A., 2019, INDONES J LIFE CYCLE, V3, P1, DOI [10.52394/ijolcas.v3i1.42, DOI 10.52394/IJOLCAS.V3I1.42]