Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: Bridging barriers in social-ecological systems in South Africa

被引:43
|
作者
Angelstam, Per [1 ]
Barnes, Garth [2 ]
Elbakidze, Marine [1 ]
Marais, Christo [2 ]
Marsh, Alex [3 ]
Polonsky, Sarah [2 ]
Richardson, David M. [4 ]
Rivers, Nina [5 ]
Shackleton, Ross T. [4 ]
Stafford, William [6 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Fac Forest Sci, Sch Forest Management, Forest Landscape Soc Network, POB 43, SE-73921 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
[2] Nat Resource Management Programmes, Dept Environm Affairs, 14 Loop St, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
[3] South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Private Bag X7, ZA-7735 Claremont, South Africa
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Bot & Zool, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-7620 Matieland, South Africa
[5] Living Lands, 120 Belvedere Rd, ZA-7708 Cape Town, South Africa
[6] CSIR, Nat Resources & Environm Unit, POB 320, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Ecological (green) infrastructure; Landscape restoration; Active adaptive management; Landscape approach; Learning by evaluation; Scaling-up; CAPE FLORISTIC REGION; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; BIOSPHERE RESERVES; FOREST; HABITAT; RESTORATION; LANDSCAPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Maintenance of functional ecological (or green) infrastructure is threatened by habitat conversion, fragmentation and loss, water scarcity, invasive species, climate change, resource extraction, poor policy implementation and societal inequity. Using South Africa as a case study, our transdisciplinary team identified actions likely to be effective in scaling up research and development projects that support implementation of policy about ecological infrastructure by active adaptive management. Based on expert knowledge at three scales, we analysed South Africa's opportunity to active adaptive management and to unlock investments that enhance functional ecological infrastructure. Barriers included lack of trust among actors, limited collaborative governance and integrated planning, including local partnerships; as well as a poor inclusion of evidence-based knowledge based on monitoring of landscape restoration efforts and its social and ecological consequences. Bridges include practicing transdisciplinary knowledge production, enhancing social learning among actors and stakeholders, and advocacy based on improved understanding. We propose a portfolio of place-based actions that could help to facilitate unlocking investments for functional ecological infrastructure by prioritising conservation, management and restoration through integrated cross-scale, collaborative and multi-sector spatial planning. Understanding the structure and dynamics of social-ecological systems, identifying champions, framing key messages for different audiences, and sharing failures and success stories internationally, are crucial requirements to unlock investments.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 304
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning
    Berkes, Fikret
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [2] Social learning for resilience in social-ecological systems
    de Kraker, Joop
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 100 - 107
  • [3] Towards a bridging concept for undesirable resilience in social-ecological systems
    Dornelles, Andre Z.
    Boyd, Emily
    Nunes, Richard J.
    Asquith, Mike
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    Delabre, Izabela
    Denney, J. Michael
    Grimm, Volker
    Jentsch, Anke
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    Schroter, Matthias
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Settele, Josef
    Shackelford, Nancy
    Standish, Rachel J.
    Yengoh, Genesis Tambang
    Oliver, Tom H.
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3
  • [4] Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social-ecological systems
    Anderies, John M.
    Mathias, Jean-Denis
    Janssen, Marco A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (12) : 5277 - 5284
  • [5] Resilience in social-ecological systems: the roles of learning and education
    Krasny, Marianne E.
    Lundholm, Cecilia
    Plummer, Ryan
    ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (5-6) : 463 - 474
  • [6] Firewood Collection in South Africa: Adaptive Behavior in Social-Ecological Models
    Lenfers, Ulfia A.
    Weyl, Julius
    Clemen, Thomas
    LAND, 2018, 7 (03)
  • [7] Mapping and characterizing social-ecological land systems of South America
    Zarba, Lucia
    Piquer-Rodriguez, Maria
    Boillat, Sebastien
    Levers, Christian
    Gasparri, Ignacio
    Aide, T. Mitchell
    Alvarez-Berrios, Nora L.
    Anderson, Liana O.
    Araoz, Ezequiel
    Arima, Eugenio
    Batistella, Mateus
    Calderon-Loor, Marco
    Echeverria, Cristian
    Gonzalez-Roglich, Mariano
    Jobbagy, Esteban G.
    Mathez-Stiefel, Sarah -Lan
    Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos
    Pacheco, Andrea
    Vallejos, Maria
    Young, Kenneth R.
    Grau, Ricardo
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (02):
  • [8] Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems
    Bodin, Orjan
    SCIENCE, 2017, 357 (6352) : 659 - +
  • [9] Reversing degradation of social-ecological systems: explaining the outcomes of interventions in Africa
    Jahel, Camille
    Lambin, Eric F.
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2024, : 439 - 468
  • [10] Strategies for managing complex social-ecological systems in the face of uncertainty: examples from South Africa and beyond
    Biggs, Reinette
    Rhode, Clint
    Archibald, Sally
    Kunene, Lucky Makhosini
    Mutanga, Shingirirai S.
    Nkuna, Nghamula
    Ocholla, Peter Omondi
    Phadima, Lehlohonolo Joe
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):