The Impact of a Novel Computer-Based Decision Aid on Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial

被引:90
作者
Schroy, Paul C., III [1 ]
Emmons, Karen [2 ]
Peters, Ellen [3 ]
Glick, Julie T. [1 ]
Robinson, Patricia A. [1 ]
Lydotes, Maria A. [1 ]
Mylvanaman, Shamini [1 ]
Evans, Stephen [4 ]
Chaisson, Christine [4 ]
Pignone, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Prout, Marianne
Davidson, Peter [1 ]
Heeren, Timothy C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Decis Res, Eugene, OR USA
[4] Boston Univ Sch Publ Hlth, Data Coordinating Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Boston Univ Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[7] Boston Univ Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
preferences and quality of life; clinical prediction rules; risk stratification; decision aids; patient decision making; provider decision making; physician-patient communication; shared decision making; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; COLON-CANCER; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; PRIMARY-CARE; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X10369007
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Eliciting patients' preferences within a framework of shared decision making (SDM) has been advocated as a strategy for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of a novel decision aid on SDM in the primary care setting. Methods. An interactive, computer-based decision aid for CRC screening was developed and evaluated within the context of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 665 average-risk patients (mean age, 57 years; 60% female; 63% black, 6% Hispanic) were allocated to 1 of 2 intervention arms (decision aid alone, decision aid plus personalized risk assessment) or a control arm. The interventions were delivered just prior to a scheduled primary care visit. Outcome measures (patient preferences, knowledge, satisfaction with the decision-making process [ SDMP], concordance between patient preference and test ordered, and intentions) were evaluated using prestudy/poststudy visit questionnaires and electronic scheduling. Results. Overall, 95% of patients in the intervention arms identified a preferred screening option based on values placed on individual test features. Mean cumulative knowledge, SDMP, and intention scores were significantly higher for both intervention groups compared with the control group. Concordance between patient preference and test ordered was 59%. Patients who preferred colonoscopy were more likely to have a test ordered than those who preferred an alternative option (83% v. 70%; P < 0.01). Intention scores were significantly higher when the test ordered reflected patient preferences. Conclusions. Our interactive computer-based decision aid facilitates SDM, but overall effectiveness is determined by the extent to which providers comply with patient preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 107
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Usability Engineering
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
[3]  
Barry M.J., 1997, DIS MANAGEMENT CLIN, V1, P5
[4]  
Braddock CH, 1997, J GEN INTERN MED, V12, P339, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00057.x
[5]   Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].
Braddock, CH ;
Edwards, KA ;
Hasenberg, NM ;
Laidley, TL ;
Levinson, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320
[6]   Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems [J].
Briss, P ;
Rimer, B ;
Reilley, B ;
Coates, RC ;
Lee, NC ;
Mullen, P ;
Corso, P ;
Hutchinson, AB ;
Hiatt, R ;
Kerner, J ;
George, P ;
White, C ;
Gandhi, N ;
Saraiya, M ;
Breslow, R ;
Isham, G ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Hinman, AR ;
Lawrence, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (01) :67-80
[7]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Harris, Russell ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Roseanne M. ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Yawn, Barbara P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :627-+
[8]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[9]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[10]   The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening - The Katie Couric effect [J].
Cram, P ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Inadomi, J ;
Cowen, ME ;
Carpenter, D ;
Vijan, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (13) :1601-1605