Design Heuristics for Effective Smartphone Questionnaires

被引:26
作者
Antoun, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Katz, Jonathan [3 ]
Argueta, Josef [3 ]
Wang, Lin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Joint Program Survey Methodol, 1218 LeFrak Hall, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Coll Informat Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] US Bur Census, Suitland, MD USA
关键词
questionnaire design; smartphone surveys; mobile web surveys; response quality; MOBILE WEB SURVEY; DEVICE AFFECT; COMPUTER; PANEL; PC; QUALITY; SLIDER; SCALES;
D O I
10.1177/0894439317727072
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Design principles for survey questionnaires viewed on desktop and laptop computers are increasingly being seen as inadequate for the design of questionnaires viewed on smartphones. Insights gained from empirical research can help those conducting mobile surveys to improve their questionnaires. This article reports on a systematic literature review of research presented or published between 2007 and 2016 that evaluated the effect of smartphone questionnaire design features on indicators of response quality. The evidence suggests that survey designers should make efforts to optimize their questionnaires to make them easier to complete on smartphones, fit question content to the width of smartphone screens to prevent horizontal scrolling, and choose simpler types of questions (single-choice questions, multiple-choice questions, text-entry boxes) over more complicated types of questions (large grids, drop boxes, slider questions). Based on these results, we identify design heuristics, or general principles, for creating effective smartphone questionnaires. We distinguish between five of them: readability, ease of selection, visibility across the page, simplicity of design elements, and predictability across devices. They provide an initial framework by which to evaluate smartphone questionnaires, though empirical testing and further refinement of the heuristics is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 574
页数:18
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Amin A, 2016, AAPOR ANN C AUST TX
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IOS HUMAN INTERFACE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MAT DES COMP
[4]   EFFECTS OF MOBILE VERSUS PC WEB ON SURVEY RESPONSE QUALITY A CROSSOVER EXPERIMENT IN A PROBABILITY WEB PANEL [J].
Antoun, Christopher ;
Couper, Mick P. ;
Conrad, Frederick G. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2017, 81 :280-306
[5]   Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study [J].
Arn, Birgit ;
Klug, Stefan ;
Kolodziejski, Janusz .
METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2015, 9 (02) :185-211
[6]  
Barlas F. M., 2015, AAPOR ANN C HOOL FL
[7]  
Brooks J., 2015, AAPOR ANN C HOLL FL
[8]  
Budiu Raluca, 2015, User Experience for Mobile Applications and Websites: Design Guidelines for Improving the Usability of Mobile Sites and Apps, V4th
[9]   Are Sliders Too Slick for Surveys? An Experiment Comparing Slider and Radio Button Scales for Smartphone, Tablet and Computer Based Surveys [J].
Buskirk, Trent D. ;
Saunders, Ted ;
Michaud, Joey .
METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2015, 9 (02) :229-259
[10]   Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter: Results from a Randomized Experiment Comparing Online Surveys Completed via Computer or Smartphone [J].
Buskirk, Trent D. ;
Andrus, Charles H. .
FIELD METHODS, 2014, 26 (04) :322-342