Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers

被引:185
作者
Moser, Andrea K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pforzheim Univ, Inst Ind Ecol, Pforzheim, Germany
[2] Univ Luneburg, Ctr Sustainabil Management, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Attitude-behavior gap; Green marketing; Organic food; Price; Self-report; Sustainability; Willingness to pay; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; ORGANIC FOOD; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; MODERATING ROLE; SELF-EFFICACY; GREEN; CONSUMPTION; ATTITUDES; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.05.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research in the area of environmentally friendly purchasing behavior reports inconsistent findings. It is also unclear which factors determine real buying behavior. Therefore, the present study develops a model which identifies major factors forming self-reported purchasing behavior (SRB). A structural equation approach is used to integrate these measures and to test if they are able to predict actual purchasing behavior. Data was obtained from a nationwide panel (n = 1760) and included survey data and retail scanner data for seven different product categories in the sector of goods for daily needs. Results show that consumers care for the environment and mirror environmental attitudes in their purchasing behavior (self-reported). Especially norms and willingness to pay are strong predictors of SRB. However, SRB is not transferred to actual purchasing behavior. Therefore, the findings corroborate the gap between stated and actual behavior. Implications for marketing are derived to encourage consumers to purchase environmentally friendly products. In the end, this not only produces benefits for the environment, but also creates opportunities for businesses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 397
页数:9
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Business Strategy and the Environment, DOI [10.1002/bse.522, DOI 10.1002/BSE.522]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, British Journal of Management, Vol, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8551.1996.TB00119.X
[6]  
Arbuckle J.L., 2012, Amos (Version 21)
[7]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[8]   Predicting intentions to purchase organic food:: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour [J].
Arvola, A. ;
Vassallo, M. ;
Dean, M. ;
Lampila, P. ;
Saba, A. ;
Lahteenmaki, L. ;
Shepherd, R. .
APPETITE, 2008, 50 (2-3) :443-454
[9]   Do social product features have value to consumers? [J].
Auger, Pat ;
Devinney, Timothy M. ;
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Burke, Paul F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2008, 25 (03) :183-191
[10]   Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Yi, Youjae .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :8-34