Association between number of prostate biopsies and patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance protocols

被引:8
|
作者
Anderson, Christopher B. [1 ]
Tin, Amy L. [2 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [2 ]
Mulhall, John P. [1 ]
Sandhu, Jaspreet [1 ]
Touijer, Karim [1 ]
Laudone, Vincent P. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave,H-1206, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
radical prostatectomy; TRUS prostate biopsy; erectile dysfunction; urinary incontinence; ERECTILE FUNCTION; REPEAT BIOPSIES; TERM OUTCOMES; CANCER; IMPACT; RISK; MEN; COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.13215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate whether the number of preoperative prostate biopsies affects functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We identified patients treated with RP at our institution between 2008 and 2011. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the patients completed questionnaires assessing erectile and urinary function. Patients with preoperative incontinence or erectile dysfunction or who did not complete the questionnaire were excluded. Primary outcomes were urinary and erectile function at 12 months postoperatively. We used logistic regression to estimate the impact of number of prostate biopsies on functional outcomes after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Results We identified 2 712 patients treated with RP between 2008 and 2011. Most of the patients (80%) had one preoperative prostate biopsy, 16% had two, and 4% had at least three. On adjusted analysis, erectile function at 12 months was not significantly different for patients with two (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90, 1.75) or three or more (OR 1.52; 95% CI 0.84, 2.78) biopsies, compared with those with one biopsy. Similarly, urinary function at 12 months was not significantly different for patients with two (0.84, 95% CI 0.64, 1.10) or three or more (0.99, 95% CI 0.60, 1.61) biopsies compared with those with one. Conclusions We did not find evidence that a greater number of preoperative prostate biopsies adversely affected erectile or urinary function at 12 months after RP.
引用
收藏
页码:E46 / E51
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Patient-reported Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in Historical and Contemporary Practice
    Singhal, Udit
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Kaffenberger, Samuel D.
    Salami, Simpa S.
    George, Arvin K.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Wittmann, Daniela A.
    Miller, David C.
    Wei, John T.
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    Montie, James E.
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [2] Effect of repeat prostate biopsies on functional outcomes after radical pro statectomy
    Rosenbaum, Clemens M.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Preisser, Felix
    Marks, Phillip
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    Salomon, Georg
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (03) : 91.e17 - 91.e22
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes after open radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Hashine, Katsuyoshi
    Kakuda, Toshio
    Luchi, Shunsuke
    Tomida, Ryotaro
    Matsumura, Masafumi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (11) : 1037 - 1042
  • [4] Patient-reported quality of life after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Arai, Y
    Okubo, K
    Aoki, Y
    Maekawa, S
    Okada, T
    Maeda, H
    Ogawa, O
    Kato, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 6 (02) : 78 - 86
  • [5] Improved patient-reported functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy by using NeuroSAFE technique
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Aas, Kirsti
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Kvan, Espen
    Falk, Ragnhild Sorum
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartvig
    Berge, Viktor
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) : 385 - 391
  • [6] Concordance between patient-reported and physician-reported sexual function after radical prostatectomy
    Thong, Alan E.
    Poon, Bing Ying
    Lee, Justin K.
    Vertosick, Emily
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (02) : 80.e1 - 80.e6
  • [7] Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance
    Balakrishnan, Ashwin S.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (03) : 506 - 510
  • [8] Pathological, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy Following Active Surveillance
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Zlotta, Alexander R.
    Kalnin, Robin
    Trachtenberg, John
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Hamilton, Robert J.
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    Finelli, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [9] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Zanaty, Marc
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zorn, Kevin
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1391 - 1397
  • [10] Treatment Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Potential Candidates for 3 Published Active Surveillance Protocols
    Thaxton, C. Shad
    Loeb, Stacy
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Kan, Donghui
    Catalona, William J.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) : 414 - 418