A model of the Go/No-Go task

被引:291
|
作者
Gomez, Pablo
Perea, Manuel
Ratcliff, Roger
机构
[1] De Paul Univ, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Methodol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
go/no-go; modeling; lexical decision task; recognition memory; perceptual decision making;
D O I
10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this article, the first explicit, theory-based comparison of 2-choice and go/no-go variants of 3 experimental tasks is presented. Prior research has questioned whether the underlying core-information processing is different for the 2 variants of a task or whether they differ mostly in response demands. The authors examined 4 different diffusion models for the go/no-go variant of each task along with a standard diffusion model for the 2-choice variant (R. Ratcliff, 1978). The 2-choice and the go/no-go models were fit to data from 4 lexical decision experiments, 1 numerosity discrimination experiment, and I recognition memory experiment, each with 2-choice and go/no-go variants. The models that assumed an implicit decision criterion for no-go responses produced better fits than models that did not. The best model was one in which only response criteria and the nondecisional components of processing changed between the 2 variants, supporting the view that the core information on which decisions are based is not different between them.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 413
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Go/No-go Association Task
    Nosek, BA
    Banaji, MR
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2001, 19 (06) : 625 - 666
  • [2] Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model
    Ratcliff, Roger
    Huang-Pollock, Cynthia
    McKoon, Gail
    DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2018, 5 (01): : 42 - 62
  • [3] Go or no-go? An assessment of inhibitory control training using the GO/NO-GO task in adolescents
    van Royen, Annelies
    van Malderen, Eva
    Desmeta, Maurane
    Goossens, Lien
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Kemps, Eva
    APPETITE, 2022, 179
  • [4] Grading odor similarities in a Go/No-Go task
    Kay, Leslie M.
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Barlas, Lale
    Bloom Edgerton, Gabrielle
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 88 (4-5) : 339 - 346
  • [5] A formal cognitive model of the Go/No-Go discrimination task: Evaluation and implications
    Yechiam, Eldad
    Goodnight, Jackson
    Bates, John E.
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    Dodge, Kenneth A.
    Pettit, Gregory S.
    Newman, Joseph P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [6] The many-facet Rasch model in the analysis of the go/no-go association task
    Vianello, Michelangelo
    Robusto, Egidio
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 42 (04) : 944 - 956
  • [7] Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Sato, Nobuya
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [8] A portable version of the go/no-go association task (GNAT)
    Bassett, JF
    Dabbs, JM
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2005, 37 (03) : 506 - 512
  • [9] The many-facet Rasch model in the analysis of the go/no-go association task
    Michelangelo Vianello
    Egidio Robusto
    Behavior Research Methods, 2010, 42 : 944 - 956
  • [10] Mistuning detection performance of ferrets in a go/no-go task
    Homma, Natsumi Y.
    Bajo, Victoria M.
    Happel, Max F. K.
    Nodal, Fernando R.
    King, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 139 (06): : EL246 - EL251