The Use of Intraoperative Sensors Significantly Increases the Patient-Reported Rate of Improvement in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Albeit multifactorial, patient satisfaction is predominantly driven by postoperative pain and function. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients are dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Objective balancing of the soft tissue envelope may contribute to significant decrease in pain and increase in function when compared with traditional subjective methods. In an effort to confirm this, a cohort of manual TKA patient outcomes was compared with sensor-assisted TKA outcomes. One hundred fourteen patients (57 manual, 57 sensor assisted) received primary TKA. Both cohorts were matched for confounding variables. The dependent variables in this study were 6-month patient-reported outcome measures, including Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score. The range of motion and incidence of arthrofibrosis were also captured for both cohorts. The rate of improvement of all patient-reported outcome scores and subscores and range of motion was significantly higher in the sensor-assisted cohort. The rate of arthrofibrosis was lower in the sensor-assisted cohort but not statistically significant. The authors rejected the null hypothesis and concluded that the rate of improvement in objective, patient-reported outcome measures was higher in the sensor-assisted cohort than the manual cohort from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively.