Operation Performance Evaluation of Power Grid Enterprise Using a Hybrid BWM-TOPSIS Method

被引:69
作者
You, Peipei [1 ]
Guo, Sen [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Haoran [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Huiru [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Grid Energy Res Inst, Dept Finance Accounting & Auditing Res, Beijing 102209, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
operation performance evaluation; power grid enterprise; BWM; TOPSIS; electricity market reform; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; BEST-WORST METHOD; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INDUSTRY REFORM; CHINA; SUSTAINABILITY; COMBINATION; PERSPECTIVE; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.3390/su9122329
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electricity market reform is in progress in China, and the operational performance of power grid enterprises are vital for its healthy and sustainable development in the current electricity market environment. In this paper, a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for operational performance evaluation of a power grid enterprise is proposed from the perspective of sustainability. The latest MCDM method, namely the best-worst method (BWM) was employed to determine the weights of all criteria, and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) was applied to rank the operation performance of a power grid enterprise. The evaluation index system was built based on the concept of sustainability, which includes three criteria (namely economy, society, and environment) and seven sub-criteria. Four power grid enterprises were selected to perform the empirical analysis, and the results indicate that power grid enterprise A1 has the best operation performance. The proposed hybrid BWM-TOPSIS-based framework for operation performance evaluation of a power grid enterprise is effective and practical.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmadi, Hadi Badri ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Rezaei, Jafar .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 126 :99-106
[2]  
[Anonymous], MATH MODELS DECISION
[3]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[4]   Performance evaluation of airport safety management systems in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Yu-Hem ;
Shao, Pei-Chi ;
Chen, Hubert J. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 75 :72-86
[5]   Water Scarcity Management in Arid Regions Based on an Extended Multiple Criteria Technique [J].
Chitsaz, Nastaran ;
Azarnivand, Ali .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (01) :233-250
[6]   Multi-Criteria Assessment of Spatial Robust Water Resource Vulnerability Using the TOPSIS Method Coupled with Objective and Subjective Weights in the Han River Basin [J].
Chung, Eun-Sung ;
Abdulai, Patricia Jitta ;
Park, Hyesun ;
Kim, Yeonjoo ;
Ahn, So Ra ;
Kim, Seong Joon .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)
[7]   Comprehensive Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of Power Grid Enterprises Based on the Model of Fuzzy Group Ideal Point Method and Combination Weighting Method with Improved Group Order Relation Method and Entropy Weight Method [J].
Dai, Shuyu ;
Niu, Dongxiao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (10)
[8]   Demand Side Management Performance Evaluation for Commercial Enterprises [J].
Dong, Jun ;
Huo, Huijuan ;
Guo, Sen .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (10)
[9]   The Most Economical Mode of Power Supply for Remote and Less Developed Areas in China: Power Grid Extension or Micro-Grid? [J].
Guo, Sen ;
Zhao, Huiru ;
Zhao, Haoran .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
[10]   Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications [J].
Guo, Sen ;
Zhao, Haoran .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 121 :23-31