Anesthesia provider performance in the first two years of merit-based incentive payment system: Shifts in reporting and predictors of receiving bonus payments

被引:7
作者
Gal, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Morewood, Gordon H. [2 ]
Mueller, Jeffrey T. [3 ]
Popovich, Matthew T. [4 ]
Caridi, John M. [5 ]
Neifert, Sean N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
[4] Amer Soc Anesthesiologists, Qual & Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Neurosurg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Neurosurg, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Merit-based incentive payment system; MIPS; MACRA; Social determinants of health; Quality measure performance; Anesthesiology; MACRA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110582
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) program was intended to align CMS quality and incentive programs. To date, no reports have described anesthesia clinician performance in the first two years of the program. Design: Observational retrospective cohort study. Setting: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services public datasets for their Quality Payment Program. Patients: Anesthesia clinicians who participated in MIPS for 2017 and 2018 performance years. Interventions: Descriptive statistics compared anesthesia clinician characteristics, practice setting, and MIPS performance between the two years to determine associations with MIPS-based payment adjustments. Measurements: Logistic regression identified independent predictors of bonus payments for exceptional performance. Main results: Compared with participants in 2017 (n = 25,604), participants in 2018 (n = 54,381) had a higher proportion of reporting through groups and alternative payment models (APMs) than as individuals (p < 0.001). The proportion of clinicians earning performance bonuses increased from 2017 to 2018 except for those MIPS participants reporting as individuals. Median total MIPS scores were higher in 2018 than 2017 (84.6 vs. 82.4, p < 0.001), although median total scores fell for participants reporting as individuals (40.9 vs 75.5, p < 0.001). Among clinicians with scores in both years (n = 20,490), 10,559 (51.3%) improved their total score between 2017 and 2018, and 347 (1.7%) changed reporting from individual to APM. Reporting as an individual compared with group reporting (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.80; p < 0.001) was associated with lower rates of bonus payments, as was having a greater proportion of patients dual-eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. Reporting through an APM (OR: 149.6; 95% CI: 110 to 203.4; p < 0.001) and increasing practice group size were associated with higher likelihood of bonus payments. Conclusions: Anesthesia clinician MIPS participation and performance were strong during 2017 and 2018 performance years. Providers who reported through groups or APMs have a higher likelihood of receiving bonus payments.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   High Rates Of Partial Participation In The First Year Of The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System [J].
Apathy, Nate C. ;
Everson, Jordan .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (09) :1513-1521
[2]   Primary Care Physicians in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): a Qualitative Investigation of Participants' Experiences, Self-Reported Practice Changes, and Suggestions for Program Administrators [J].
Berdahl, Carl T. ;
Easterlin, Molly C. ;
Ryan, Gery ;
Needleman, Jack ;
Nuckols, Teryl K. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (10) :2275-2281
[3]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) HHS., 2017, Fed Regist, V82, P53568
[4]   Addressing Social Determinants of Health Time for a Polysocial Risk Score [J].
Figueroa, Jose F. ;
Frakt, Austin B. ;
Jha, Ashish K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (16) :1553-1554
[5]   Metric selection by dermatologists in the 2017 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System [J].
Gronbeck, Christian ;
Feng, Paula W. ;
Feng, Hao .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (04) :1192-1196
[6]   Participation and Performance of Dermatologists in the 2017 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System [J].
Gronbeck, Christian ;
Feng, Paula W. ;
Feng, Hao .
JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 156 (04) :466-468
[7]   Clinicians With High Socially At-Risk Caseloads Received Reduced Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Scores [J].
Johnston, Kenton J. ;
Hockenberry, Jason M. ;
Wadhera, Rishi K. ;
Maddox, Karen E. Joynt .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (09) :1504-1512
[8]   Association of Clinician Health System Affiliation With Outpatient Performance Ratings in the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System [J].
Johnston, Kenton J. ;
Wiemken, Timothy L. ;
Hockenberry, Jason M. ;
Figueroa, Jose F. ;
Joynt Maddox, Karen E. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (10) :984-992
[9]   Association Between Patient Social Risk and Physician Performance Scores in the First Year of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System [J].
Khullar, Dhruv ;
Schpero, William L. ;
Bond, Amelia M. ;
Qian, Yuting ;
Casalino, Lawrence P. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (10) :975-983
[10]   Intraoperative Electronic Alerts Improve Compliance With National Quality Program Measure for Perioperative Temperature Management [J].
Lakha, Sameer ;
Levin, Matthew A. ;
Leibowitz, Andrew B. ;
Lin, Hung-Mo ;
Gal, Jonathan S. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (05) :1167-1175