An AHP-based approach toward enterprise architecture analysis based on enterprise architecture quality attributes

被引:29
作者
Razavi, Mahsa [1 ]
Aliee, Fereidoon Shams [2 ]
Badie, Kambiz [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Telecommun Res Ctr, IT Res Fac, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Enterprise Architecture; Decision making; Quality attribute; Analytical Hierarchy Process; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10115-010-0312-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Enterprise Architecture (EA) as a discipline that manages large amount of models and information about different aspects of the enterprise, can support decision making on enterprise-wide issues. In order to provide such support, EA information should be amenable to analysis of various utilities and quality attributes. In this regard, we have proposed the idea of characterizing and using enterprise architecture quality attributes. And this paper provides a quantitative AHP-based method toward expert-based EA analysis. Our method proposes a step-by-step process of assessing quality attribute achievement of different scenarios using AHP. By this method, most suitable EA scenarios are selected according to prioritized enterprise utilities and this selection has an important affect on decision making in enterprises. The proposed method also introduces a data structure that contains required information about quality attribute achievement of different EA scenarios in enterprises. The stored asset can be used for further decision making and progress assessment in future. Sensitivity analysis is also part of the process to identify sensitive points in the decision process. The applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated using a practical case study.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 472
页数:24
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Al-Naeem T, 2005, PROC INT CONF SOFTW, P244
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, FRAMEWORK ENTERPRISE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AHP SERIES
[4]  
Armour F. J., 1999, IT Professional, V1, P31, DOI 10.1109/6294.781623
[5]  
BOER F, 2005, P 38 ANN HAW INT C S, V8, pB222
[6]  
Buckl S, 2009, LECT NOTES BUS INF, V38, P66
[7]   Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Ruan, Da .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 77 (5-6) :464-475
[8]  
Buyukyazici M., 2003, Hecettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, V32, P65
[9]   Study of Prioritization Techniques using Students as subjects [J].
Danesh, Amir Seyed ;
Ahmad, Rodina .
2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :390-394
[10]  
DAVIDSSON P, 2005, LNCS, V3950, P205