Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures

被引:0
作者
Fontijn-Tekamp, FA
Slagter, AP
van't Hof, MA
Geertman, ME
Kalk, W
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Oral Funct & Prosthet Dent, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Med Stat, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
bite force; dental implants; overdentures; complete dentures;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Sensitivity or pain of the mucoperiosteum covering the mandibular edentulous ridge is often thought to limit bite forces in complete-denture wearers. Therefore, bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures may depend on the degree of implant support. This study analyzed the effects of different degrees of support for the mandibular denture on bite forces measured four years after denture treatment as part of a randomized controlled clinical trial. All subjects had received new maxillary dentures and (1) mainly implant-home overdentures on a transmandibular implant (TMI), (2) mucosa-borne overdentures on two cylindric permucosal IMZ implants, or (3) new conventional dentures in the mandible. Fifty-three women and 15 men (mean age, 59.1 yrs; range, 41 to 77) participated in this trial. Both unilateral and bilateral bite forces were recorded at different positions with a miniature strain gauge transducer and a mechanical bite fork, respectively. The subjects were asked to bite at three force levels. Results indicated that women had significantly lower maximum bite forces than men. Persons with mandibular implant-retained overdentures had significantly higher unilateral and bilateral maximum bite forces than complete-denture wearers. However, bite forces did not differ between the mainly implant-borne (TMI) and mucosa-implant-borne (IMZ) implant systems. Therefore, it appears that differences in support for the mandibular overdenture by dental implants are not reflected in bite force capabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1832 / 1839
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL-TRIALS BY TREATMENT ACTUALLY RECEIVED - IS IT REALLY AN OPTION [J].
LEE, YJ ;
ELLENBERG, JH ;
HIRTZ, DG ;
NELSON, KB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (10) :1595-1605
[22]   LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON CHEWING WITH MANDIBULAR FIXED PROSTHESES ON OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS [J].
LINDQUIST, LW ;
CARLSSON, GE .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 43 (01) :39-45
[23]  
LINDQUIST LW, 1982, CLIN APPL BIOMATERIA, P151
[24]  
Mericske-Stern R, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P641
[25]   In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants [J].
MericskeStern, R ;
Zarb, GA .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :153-161
[26]   BITING STRENGTH AND CHEWING FORCES IN COMPLETE DENTURE WEARERS [J].
MICHAEL, CG ;
JAVID, NS ;
COLAIZZI, FA ;
GIBBS, CH .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 63 (05) :549-553
[27]   SIGNIFICANCE OF TESTS FOR BITING STRENGTH [J].
OROURKE, JT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1949, 38 (05) :627-633
[28]   Effect of jaw opening on the direction and magnitude of human incisal bite forces [J].
Paphangkorakit, J ;
Osborn, JW .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (01) :561-567
[29]  
Richter E J, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P99
[30]   HUMAN JAW-ELEVATOR MUSCLE-ACTIVITY AND FOOD COMMINUTION IN THE DENTATE AND EDENTULOUS STATE [J].
SLAGTER, AP ;
BOSMAN, F ;
VANDERGLAS, HW ;
VANDERBILT, A .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (03) :195-205