Automated volumetry at CT colonography: A phantom study

被引:17
作者
Blake, ME [1 ]
Soto, JA [1 ]
Hayes, RA [1 ]
Ferrucci, JT [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
virtual colonoscopy; CT colonography; computer aided detection; colonic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To assess the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for measuring polyp-like structures on CT colonography (CTC) images of a phantom. Materials and Methods. We constructed a Plexiglas phantom to which we affixed a series of idealized Plexiglas polyp-like objects, including spheres and hemispheres. We imaged the phantom in a four-channel detector CT scanner at a 1.3 mm slice thickness with a reconstruction interval of 0.6 mm, using combinations of 100 mAs, 30 mAs, horizontal and vertical orientation. For each set of CT images, the interior surface of the phantom was segmented. The CAD algorithm was applied to the resulting surface to identify the polypoid regions of interest and to calculate their volume and maximum linear dimension. Calculated values were then compared with actual values to yield percent error in each measurement. Results. The mean error in volume for the subgroups of spheres and hemispheres was 3% and 5% respectively. Mean error in linear dimension was approximately 2% for both shape subgroups. All CAD-calculated values were closely correlated with their respective actual values. Parameter selection did not significantly affect the accuracy of the calculated measurements. Conclusions. Our CAD software accurately measured the greatest linear dimension and the volume of each of the polyp-like structures in our phantom. Results were largely independent of phantom orientation and the CT exposure factors. (c) AUR, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 613
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[2]   A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[3]  
FENNERTY MB, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P496
[4]   Virtual colonoscopy [J].
Ferrucci, J ;
Barish, M ;
Choi, R ;
Dachman, A ;
Fenlon, H ;
Glick, S ;
Laghi, A ;
Macari, M ;
Morrin, M ;
Paulson, E ;
Pickhardt, P ;
Soto, J ;
Yee, J ;
Zalis, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (04) :431-432
[5]   Polyp segmentation method for CT colonography computer aided detection [J].
Jerebko, AK ;
Teerlink, SB ;
Franaszek, M ;
Summers, RM .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTION: METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 5031 :359-369
[6]   Chest CT: Automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time - Preliminary experience [J].
Ko, JP ;
Betke, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (01) :267-273
[7]   Small pulmonary nodules: Reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT [J].
Kostis, WJ ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Reeves, AP ;
Fluture, SC ;
Henschke, CI .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :446-452
[8]   Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: Evaluation with CT colonography [J].
Macari, M ;
Bini, EJ ;
Jacobs, SL ;
Naik, S ;
Lui, YW ;
Milano, A ;
Rajapaksa, R ;
Megibow, AJ ;
Babb, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :629-636
[9]   HOW ACCURATE ARE ENDOSCOPIC ESTIMATES OF SIZE [J].
MARGULIES, C ;
KREVSKY, B ;
CATALANO, MF .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (02) :174-177
[10]  
MILLER MT, 2003, INT SOC OPTICAL ENG, V5031, P102