How to quantify the impacts of diversification on sustainability? A review of indicators in coffee systems

被引:14
作者
Teixeira, Heitor Mancini [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schulte, Rogier P. O. [2 ]
Anten, Niels P. R. [4 ]
Bosco, Leosane C. [5 ]
Baartman, Jantiene E. M. [6 ]
Moinet, Gabriel Y. K. [7 ]
Reidsma, Pytrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Prod Syst Grp, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Farming Syst Ecol Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Ctr Crop Syst Anal, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Conservacionist Agr CNPq Grp, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[6] Wageningen Univ & Res, Soil Phys & Land Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Wageningen Univ & Res, Soil Biol Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Sustainability; Agricultural systems; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Input use; Socio-economic; Resilience; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; PLANT DIVERSITY; AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOIL-EROSION; BIODIVERSITY; SHADE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-022-00785-5
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Despite the potential of diversification strategies to achieve sustainability, diversified systems such as agroforestry are still not widely implemented by farmers, which indicates the need to further understand and adequately assess the impacts of diversification to inform the design of complex systems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review focused on agroforestry coffee systems, to assess (i) how current methods and indicators are used to quantify the impact of diversification on multiple dimensions of system sustainability, and (ii) to assess the impact of diversification through coffee agroforestry on multiple dimensions of sustainability. Our analysis was based on 215 selected papers and all the indicators identified could be classified in one of the sustainability dimensions proposed in our framework: ecosystem services (57.2%), biodiversity (35.6%), input use (4%), socio-economic sustainability (2.7%) and resilience capacity (0.5%). Despite the broad scope of the indicators, individual studies were found to often lack interdisciplinarity and a systemic view on agroecosystems. Besides, not only were there few studies that included the impacts of diversification on input use, socio-economic sustainability and resilience capacity, but specific biodiversity attributes (e.g. functional diversity, landscape diversity) and ecosystem services (e.g. soil biological quality, water regulation, pollination) were generally underreported. The impact of diversification was more positive than negative in all dimensions of sustainability, with the exception of crop productivity. Yet, diversified systems are associated with reduced costs and high yields can still be achieved in diversified systems with appropriate agricultural management (e.g. adequate number and type of shade trees). Key to reaping the benefits of diversified systems is that the diversity of elements is carefully integrated considering the impact on multiple dimensions of system sustainability. A better understanding of synergies and trade-offs remains crucial for the customized design of diverse and sustainable systems for a variety of geo-climatic conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis [J].
Acosta-Alba, Ivonne ;
Boissy, Joachim ;
Chia, Eduardo ;
Andrieu, Nadine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (02) :252-266
[2]   Stand structural diversity rather than species diversity enhances aboveground carbon storage in secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China [J].
Ali, Arshad ;
Yan, En-Rong ;
Chen, Han Y. H. ;
Chang, Scott X. ;
Zhao, Yan-Tao ;
Yang, Xiao-Dong ;
Xu, Ming-Shan .
BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2016, 13 (16) :4627-4635
[3]   The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems [J].
Altieri, MA .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) :19-31
[4]   Mitigation Of Climate Change Of Coffee Production Systems In Cundinamarca, Colombia [J].
Andrade, Hernan J. ;
Zapata, Piedad C. .
FLORESTA E AMBIENTE, 2019, 26 (03) :1-11
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, FAOSTAT
[6]   A Bioeconomic Model of Ecosystem Services Provision: Coffee Berry Borer and Shade-grown Coffee in Colombia [J].
Atallah, Shady S. ;
Gomez, Miguel I. ;
Jaramillo, Juliana .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 144 :129-138
[7]   Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China [J].
Bai, Zhanguo ;
Caspari, Thomas ;
Gonzalez, Maria Ruiperez ;
Batjes, Niels H. ;
Mader, Paul ;
Bunemann, Else K. ;
de Goede, Ron ;
Brussaard, Lijbert ;
Xu, Minggang ;
Santos Ferreira, Carla Sofia ;
Reintam, Endla ;
Fan, Hongzhu ;
Mihelic, Rok ;
Glavan, Matjaz ;
Toth, Zoltan .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 265 :1-7
[8]   Leaf economics traits predict litter decomposition of tropical plants and differ among land use types [J].
Bakker, Maartje Anne ;
Carreno-Rocabado, Geovana ;
Poorter, Lourens .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) :473-483
[9]   Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Siddique, Ilyas ;
Dee, Laura ;
Paquette, Alain ;
Isbell, Forest ;
Gonzalez, Andrew ;
Byrnes, Jarrett ;
O'Connor, Mary I. ;
Hungate, Bruce A. ;
Griffin, John N. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (01) :49-57
[10]   On the evaluation of soil erosion models: Are we doing enough? [J].
Batista, Pedro V. G. ;
Davies, Jessica ;
Silva, Marx L. N. ;
Quinton, John N. .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2019, 197