Multidisciplinary Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Specimens Reduces Number of Positive Margins

被引:10
作者
Tevis, S. E. [1 ]
Neuman, H. B. [2 ]
Mittendorf, E. A. [1 ,3 ]
Kuerer, H. M. [1 ]
Bedrosian, I. [1 ]
DeSnyder, S. M. [1 ]
Thompson, A. M. [1 ]
Black, D. M. [1 ]
Scoggins, M. E. [1 ]
Sahin, A. A. [1 ]
Hunt, K. K. [1 ]
Caudle, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[3] Dana Farber Brigham & Womens Canc Ctr, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CARCINOMA IN-SITU; CONSERVING SURGERY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RE-EXCISION; LUMPECTOMY; CANCER; MASTECTOMY; WOMEN; RATES; REOPERATION;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-018-6607-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Successful breast-conserving surgery requires achieving negative margins. At our institution, the whole surgical specimen is imaged and then serially sectioned with repeat imaging. A multidisciplinary discussion then determines need for excision of additional margins. The goal of this study was to determine the benefit of each component of this approach in reducing the number of positive margin. This single-institution, prospective study included ten breast surgical oncologists who were surveyed to ascertain whether they would have taken additional margins based their review of whole specimen images (WSI) and review of serially sectioned images (SSI). These results were compared with the multidisciplinary decisions (MDD) and pathology results. Margin status was defined using consensus guidelines. One hundred surveys were completed. Margins on the original specimen were positive or close in 21%. After WSI, surgeons reported that they would have taken additional margins in 26 cases, reducing the number of positive/close margins from 21 to 13% (p < 0.001). After SSI, 52 would have taken additional margins; however, the number of positive/close margins remained 13%. MDD resulted in additional margins taken in 56 cases, reducing the number of positive/close margins to 7% (p < 0.001 compared with SSI). While surgeon review of specimen radiographs can decrease the number of positive or close margins from 21 to 13%, more rigorous multidisciplinary, intraoperative margin assessment reduces the number of close or positive margins to 7%.
引用
收藏
页码:2932 / 2938
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates
    Azu, Michelle
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Katz, Steven J.
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Morrow, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 558 - 563
  • [2] Balch GC, 2005, AM SURGEON, V71, P22
  • [3] Attaining Negative Margins in Breast-Conservation Operations: Is There a Consensus among Breast Surgeons?
    Blair, Sarah L.
    Thompson, Kari
    Rococco, Joseph
    Malcarne, Vanessa
    Beitsch, Peter D.
    Ollila, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (05) : 608 - 613
  • [4] Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Hieken, Tina J.
    Jakub, James W.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Grant, Clive S.
    Farley, David R.
    Thomsen, Kristine M.
    Osborn, John B.
    Keeney, Gary L.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2014, 156 (01) : 190 - 197
  • [5] Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Babiera, Gildy V.
    Singletary, S. Eva
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Ames, Frederick C.
    Feig, Barry W.
    Buchholz, Thomas A.
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 1458 - 1471
  • [6] Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery
    Chagpar, A
    Yen, T
    Sahin, A
    Hunt, KK
    Whitman, GJ
    Ames, FC
    Ross, MI
    Meric-Bernstam, F
    Babiera, GV
    Singletary, SE
    Kuerer, HM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 186 (04) : 371 - 377
  • [7] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Killelea, Brigid K.
    Tsangaris, Theodore N.
    Butler, Meghan
    Stavris, Karen
    Li, Fangyong
    Yao, Xiaopan
    Bossuyt, Veerle
    Harigopal, Malini
    Lannin, Donald R.
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Horowitz, Nina R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (06) : 503 - 510
  • [8] Radiography of the surgical specimen in early stage breast lesions: diagnostic reliability in the analysis of the resection margins
    Ciccarelli, G.
    Di Virgilio, M. R.
    Menna, S.
    Garretti, L.
    Ala, A.
    Giani, R.
    Bussone, R.
    Canavese, G.
    Berardengo, E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2007, 112 (03): : 366 - 376
  • [9] Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials
    Darby S.
    McGale P.
    Correa C.
    Taylor C.
    Arriagada R.
    Clarke M.
    Cutter D.
    Davies C.
    Ewertz M.
    Godwin J.
    Gray R.
    Pierce L.
    Whelan T.
    Wang Y.
    Peto R.
    Albain K.
    Anderson S.
    Barlow W.
    Bergh J.
    Bliss J.
    Buyse M.
    Cameron D.
    Carrasco E.
    Coates A.
    Collins R.
    Costantino J.
    Cuzick J.
    Davidson N.
    Davies K.
    Delmestri A.
    Di Leo A.
    Dowsett M.
    Elphinstone P.
    Evans V.
    Gelber R.
    Gettins L.
    Geyer C.
    Goldhirsch A.
    Gregory C.
    Hayes D.
    Hill C.
    Ingle J.
    Jakesz R.
    James S.
    Kaufmann M.
    Kerr A.
    MacKinnon E.
    McHugh T.
    Norton L.
    Ohashi Y.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) : 1707 - 1716
  • [10] Breast Surgery Outcomes as Quality Measures According to the NSQIP Database
    Eck, Dustin L.
    Koonce, Stephanie L.
    Goldberg, Ross F.
    Bagaria, Sanjay
    Gibson, Tammeza
    Bowers, Steven P.
    McLaughlin, Sarah A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 3212 - 3217