Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the 'Field' or 'Non-Field'

被引:164
作者
Bell, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulster, Transit Justice Inst, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
HUMAN-RIGHTS VIOLATIONS; SETTLING ACCOUNTS; PEACE;
D O I
10.1093/ijtj/ijn044
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Transitional justice appears to be an established field of scholarship connected to a field of practice on how to deal with past human rights abuses in societies in transition. The original focus of transitional justice discourse was that human rights law requires accountability in transitions, rooted in the discipline of law. Over time, this focus has been expanded to include a much broader range of mechanisms, goals and inquiries across a range of disciplines. In order to probe the current state of the field, this article argues against the current conception of transitional justice as a praxis-based interdisciplinary field. It suggests that there is a hidden politics to how transitional justice has been constructed as an interdisciplinary field that obscures tensions between the range of practices and goals that it now incorporates.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 27
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
ANDERLINI SN, 2007, INCLUSIVE SECURITY S
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCSL200307
[3]  
[Anonymous], PEACE AGREEMENTS ACC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NORDICOM REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT J TRANSITIONAL J
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J TRANSITIONAL J, V1
[7]   Democratization and Transitional Justice [J].
Arenhoevel, Mark .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2008, 15 (03) :570-587
[8]   Social Reconstruction as a Local Process [J].
Arriaza, Laura ;
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE, 2008, 2 (02) :152-172
[9]  
ARTHUR P, HUMAN RIGHT IN PRESS
[10]  
BALKIN JM, 2006, YALE J LAW HUMANITIE, V18, P178