Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy A Systematic Review of Validation Studies

被引:85
作者
Bello, Natalie A. [1 ]
Woolley, Jonathan J. [3 ]
Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence [2 ]
Falzon, Louise [1 ]
Alpert, Bruce S. [4 ]
Oparil, Suzanne [5 ]
Cutter, Gary [6 ]
Wapner, Ronald [2 ]
Muntner, Paul [7 ]
Tita, Alan T. [8 ,9 ]
Shimbo, Daichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Econ, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[9] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, Birmingham, AL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
blood pressure; blood pressure monitors; hypertension; preeclampsia; pregnancy; sphygmomanometers; BRITISH-HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY; INFLATIONARY OSCILLOMETRY; MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; CLINICAL ACCURACY; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; UNITED-STATES; PREECLAMPSIA; MONITORS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and dabl from inception through August 3, 2017 for articles that assessed the validity of an upper arm BP measurement device against a mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnant women. Two independent investigators determined eligibility, extracted data, and adjudicated protocol violations. From 1798 potential articles identified, 41, that assessed 28 devices, met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (n=32) followed a standard or modified American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization, British Hypertension Society, or European Society of Hypertension validation protocol. Several articles described the results of validation studies performed on >1 device (n=7) or in >1 population of pregnant women (n=12), comprising 64 pairwise validity assessments. The device was validated in 61% (32 of 52) of studies which used a standard or modified protocol. Only 34% (11 of 32) of the studies wherein the device was successfully validated were performed without a protocol violation. Given the implications of inaccurate BP measurement in pregnant women, healthcare providers should be aware of and try to use the BP measurement devices which have been properly validated in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 335
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   The validity of blood pressure kiosk validation studies: a systematic review [J].
Al Hamarneh, Yazid N. ;
Houle, Sherilyn K. D. ;
Chatterley, Patricia ;
Tsuyuki, Ross T. .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (03) :167-172
[2]  
[Anonymous], ARTERIAL HYPERTENSIO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Obstetrics and Gynecology, V122, P1122, DOI [DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88, 10.1097/01.aog.0000437382.03963.88]
[4]  
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation American National Standard, 2003, SP102002A1 ANSIAAMI
[5]  
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation American National Standard, 1987, SP101987 ANSIAAMI
[6]  
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation American National Standard, 2013, 8106022013 ANSIAAMI
[7]   Overview of Maternal Morbidity During Hospitalization for Labor and Delivery in the United States 1993-1997 and 2001-2005 [J].
Berg, Cynthia J. ;
MacKay, Andrea R. ;
Qin, Cheng ;
Callaghan, William M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (05) :1075-1081
[8]   Screening for Preeclampsia US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten ;
Grossman, David C. ;
Curry, Susan J. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
Davidson, Karina W. ;
Doubeni, Chyke A. ;
Epling, John W., Jr. ;
Kemper, Alex R. ;
Krist, Alex H. ;
Kurth, Ann E. ;
Landefeld, C. Seth ;
Mangione, Carol M. ;
Phillips, William R. ;
Phipps, Maureen G. ;
Silverstein, Michael ;
Simon, Melissa A. ;
Tseng, Chien-Wen .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (16) :1661-1667
[9]   Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Special Report: SMFM Statement: benefit of antihypertensive therapy for mild-to-moderate chronic hypertension during pregnancy remains uncertain [J].
Blackwell, Sean ;
Berghella, Vincenzo ;
Biggio, Joseph ;
Caughey, Aaron ;
Craigo, Sabrina ;
Dashe, Jodi ;
Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia ;
Hibbard, Judith ;
Lo, Jamie ;
Manuck, Tracy ;
Norton, Mary ;
Pacheco, Luis ;
Plante, Lauren ;
Pressman, Eva ;
Riley, Laura ;
Sciscione, Anthony ;
Silverman, Neil ;
Tuuli, Methodius ;
Robinson, Christopher ;
Saade, George ;
Rajan, Priya ;
Wendel, George ;
Ecker, Jeffrey .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01) :3-4
[10]   Accuracy of automated blood pressure recorders in pregnancy [J].
Brown, MA ;
Robinson, A ;
Buddle, ML .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 38 (03) :262-265