Quantifying athlete self-talk

被引:73
作者
Hardy, J
Hall, CR
Hardy, L
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Sch Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, Bangor LL57 2PZ, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Kinesiol, London, England
关键词
self-talk; motivational; instructional; sex; skill level; sport type;
D O I
10.1080/02640410500130706
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Two studies were conducted. The aims of Study 1 were (a) to generate quantitative data on the content of athletes' self-talk and (b) to examine differences in the use of self-talk in general as well as the functions of self-talk in practice and competition settings. Differences in self-talk between the sexes, sport types and skill levels were also assessed. Athletes (n = 295, mean age = 21.9 years) from a variety of sports and competitive levels completed the Self-Talk Use Questionnaire (STUQ), which was developed specifically for the study. In Study 1, single-factor between-group multivariate analyses of variance revealed significant differences across sex and sport type for the content of self-talk. Mixed-model multivariate analyses of variance revealed overall greater use of self-talk, as well as increased use of the functions of self-talk, in competition compared with practice. Moreover, individual sport athletes reported greater use of self-talk, as well as the functions of self-talk, than their team sport counterparts. In Study 2, recreational volleyball players (n = 164, mean age = 21.5 years) completed a situationally modified STUQ. The results were very similar to those of Study 1. That the content of athlete self-talk was generally positive, covert and abbreviated lends support to the application of Vygotsky's (1986) verbal self-regulation theory to the study of self-talk in sport. Researchers are encouraged to examine the effectiveness of self-talk in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 917
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Recommendations for self-statement inventories: Use of valence, end points, frequency, and relative frequency [J].
Amsel, R ;
Fichten, CS .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1998, 22 (03) :255-277
[2]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   A FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING PERSONALITY IN THE STRESS PROCESS [J].
BOLGER, N ;
ZUCKERMAN, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (05) :890-902
[5]   PEAK PERFORMANCE AND THE PERILS OF RETROSPECTIVE INTROSPECTION [J].
BREWER, BW ;
LINDER, DE ;
VANRAALTE, JL ;
VANRAALTE, NS .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 13 (03) :227-238
[6]  
Diaz Rafael M., 1992, Private Speech: From Social Interaction to Self-regulation, P55
[7]  
Hall CraigR., 1990, The Sport Psychologist, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1123/TSP.4.1.1
[8]   Intensity and direction of competitive state anxiety as interpreted by rugby players and rifle shooters [J].
Hanton, S ;
Jones, G ;
Mullen, R .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2000, 90 (02) :513-521
[9]   A note on athletes' use of self-talk [J].
Hardy, J ;
Hall, CR ;
Hardy, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 16 (03) :251-257
[10]   Exploring self-talk and affective states in sport [J].
Hardy, J ;
Hall, CR ;
Alexander, MR .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2001, 19 (07) :469-475