Are small, medium- and micro-sized enterprises engines of innovation? The reality in South Africa

被引:43
作者
Booyens, Irma [1 ]
机构
[1] Human Sci Res Council, Ctr Sci Technol & Innovat Indicators, Private Bag X9182, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM SIZE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION; ADOPTION; PARADOX; POLICY;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/38.1.67
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between innovation activity and firm size in the South African context. Based on data from the National Innovation Survey (2002-2004) the paper looks in particular at the nature of innovation by small, medium- and micro-sized enterprises (SMMEs). The main finding is that the innovation rate of SMMEs is relatively high, with small enterprises reporting the highest innovation rate. A limited dependent variable regression, however, determines a negative statistically significant relationship between the probability to innovate and firm size. SMMEs are therefore not more innovative than large enterprises in South Africa. This paper identifies innovative entrepreneurs and micro enterprises as important foci for entrepreneurship and innovation policy.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 78
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[2]   RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS AND RECIPIENT FIRM SIZE [J].
ACS, ZJ ;
AUDRETSCH, DB ;
FELDMAN, MP .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1994, 76 (02) :336-340
[3]  
ACS ZJ, 1987, STATISTICS, V69, P567
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KNOWL BAS EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Policy Research Paper Working Paper
[6]  
the World Bank
[7]  
Aralica Z., 2008, Innovation Propensity in Croatian Enterprises: Results of the Community Innovation Survey
[8]  
Archibugi D., 2002, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, V70, P851
[9]  
AUDRETSCH D., 2003, HDB URBAN REGIONAL E, V4, P1
[10]   Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Keilbach, Max .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (10) :1697-1705