The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3

被引:120
作者
Muller, Stephanie [1 ]
Lesage, Pascal [1 ]
Ciroth, Andreas [2 ]
Mutel, Christopher [3 ]
Weidema, Bo P. [4 ]
Samson, Rejean [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Dept Chem Engn, CIRAIG, Stn Ctr Ville, POB 6079, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[2] GreenDelta GmbH, Mullerstr 135, D-13349 Berlin, Germany
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Aalborg Univ, Skibbrogade 5, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Data quality; Life cycle inventory database; Pedigree matrix; Probability density functions; Uncertainty; LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY; UNCERTAINTY; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-014-0759-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Data used in life cycle inventories are uncertain (Ciroth et al. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(4):216-226, 2004). The ecoinvent LCI database considers uncertainty on exchange values. The default approach applied to quantify uncertainty in ecoinvent is a semi-quantitative approach based on the use of a pedigree matrix; it considers two types of uncertainties: the basic uncertainty (the epistemic error) and the additional uncertainty (the uncertainty due to using imperfect data). This approach as implemented in ecoinvent v2 has several weaknesses or limitations, one being that uncertainty is always considered as following a lognormal distribution. The aim of this paper is to show how ecoinvent v3 will apply this approach to all types of distributions allowed by the ecoSpold v2 data format. A new methodology was developed to apply the semi-quantitative approach to distributions other than the lognormal. This methodology and the consequent formulas were based on (1) how the basic and the additional uncertainties are combined for the lognormal distribution and on (2) the links between the lognormal and the normal distributions. These two points are summarized in four principles. In order to test the robustness of the proposed approach, the resulting parameters for all probability density functions (PDFs) are tested with those obtained through a Monte Carlo simulation. This comparison will validate the proposed approach. In order to combine the basic and the additional uncertainties for the considered distributions, the coefficient of variation (CV) is used as a relative measure of dispersion. Formulas to express the definition parameters for each distribution modeling a flow with its total uncertainty are given. The obtained results are illustrated with default values; they agree with the results obtained through the Monte Carlo simulation. Some limitations of the proposed approach are cited. Providing formulas to apply the semi-quantitative pedigree approach to distributions other than the lognormal will allow the life cycle assessment (LCA) practitioner to select the appropriate distribution to model a datum with its total uncertainty. These data variability definition technique can be applied on all flow exchanges and also on parameters which play an important role in ecoinvent v3.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1337
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bauer C., 2013, SWISS CENT LIFE CYCL
[2]   Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA [J].
Björklund, AE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (02) :64-72
[3]   Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments - A combined model of simulation and approximation [J].
Ciroth, A ;
Fleischer, G ;
Steinbach, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2004, 9 (04) :216-226
[4]   Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent [J].
Ciroth, Andreas ;
Muller, Stephanie ;
Weidema, Bo ;
Lesage, Pascal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) :1338-1348
[5]   Data Quality and Uncertainty in LCI [J].
Coulon, Remi ;
Camobreco, Vincent ;
Teulon, Helene ;
Besnainou, Jacques .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1997, 2 (03) :178-182
[6]   The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework [J].
Frischknecht, R ;
Jungbluth, N ;
Althaus, HJ ;
Doka, G ;
Dones, R ;
Heck, T ;
Hellweg, S ;
Hischier, R ;
Nemecek, T ;
Rebitzer, G ;
Spielmann, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (01) :3-9
[7]  
Funtowicz S. O., 1990, Uncertainty and quality in science for policy, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1_3
[8]   Analytical uncertainty propagation in life cycle inventory and impact assessment: application to an automobile front panel [J].
Hong, Jinglan ;
Shaked, Shanna ;
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. ;
Jolliet, Olivier .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (05) :499-510
[9]  
Huijbregts M.A. J., 1998, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V3, P273, DOI [10.1007/BF02979835, DOI 10.1007/BF02979835]
[10]   Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling [J].
Huijbregts, MAJ ;
Gilijamse, W ;
Ragas, AMJ ;
Reijnders, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (11) :2600-2608