2% aqueous vs alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis in VLBW neonates undergoing peripheral venipuncture: a non-inferiority trial

被引:8
作者
Jain, Amish [1 ]
Deshpande, Poorva [1 ]
Yoon, Eugene W. [2 ]
Lee, Kyong-Soon [3 ]
McGeer, Allison [4 ]
Shah, Vibhuti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Maternal & Infant Care Res Ctr MiCare, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Div Neonatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Microbiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; POVIDONE-IODINE; CATHETER COLONIZATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NHS HOSPITALS; PREVENTION; GLUCONATE; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41372-022-01337-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate (AQC) vs. 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ALC) for pre-venipuncture skin antisepsis in very-low-birth-weight neonates (VLBW, birth-weight <1500 grams). STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomized 199 VLBW neonates, age 2-28 days, to receive pre-venipuncture skin preparation using single application of swabstick impregnated with AQC (n = 99) or ALC (n = 100). Skin clearance rate (percentage post-cleansing skin swabs with <15 bacterial colony forming units) with a 10% non-inferiority margin for AQC was primary outcome. Absolute and relative CFU reduction and adverse skin reactions were compared. RESULTS: AQC's clearance was non-inferior to ALC (91% vs. 88%; 95% CI -6.6%, +12.4%). Median (interquartile range) absolute [61 (16, 110) vs. 63 (18, 100); p = 0.65] and relative [100% (97%, 100%) vs. 100% (99.7%, 100%); p = 0.20] CFU reductions were similar. Neither group experienced any adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: AQC may provide non-inferior skin disinfection to ALC in VLBW neonates.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-assosciated infections in NHS hospitals in England
    Pratt, R. J.
    Petlowe, C. M.
    Wilson, J. A.
    Loveday, H. P.
    Harper, P. J.
    Jones, S. R. L. J.
    McDougall, C.
    Wilcox, M. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 65 : S1 - S64
  • [22] Sathiyamurthy Sundar, 2016, World J Clin Pediatr, V5, P159, DOI 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.159
  • [23] SKIN ANTISEPSIS SURVEY IN AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND NEONATAL NURSERIES
    Shah, Dharmesh
    Tracy, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (07) : 601 - 602
  • [24] Aqueous chlorhexidine 1% versus 2% for neonatal skin antisepsis: a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Sharma, Akash
    Kulkarni, Srikant
    Thukral, Anu
    Sankar, M. Jeeva
    Agarwal, Ramesh
    Deorari, A. K.
    Mohapatra, Sarita
    Velpandian, Thirumurthy
    Bajpai, Minu
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2021, 106 (06): : F643 - F648
  • [25] Chlorhexidine Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Results from a National Survey
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Aucott, Susan W.
    Milstone, Aaron M.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 846 - 849
  • [26] Prospective randomized trial of 3 antiseptic solutions for prevention of catheter colonization in an intensive care unit for adult patients
    Valles, J.
    Fernandez, I.
    Alcaraz, D.
    Chacon, E.
    Cazorla, A.
    Canals, M.
    Mariscal, D.
    Fontanals, D.
    Moron, A.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (09) : 847 - 853
  • [27] Skin Injuries and Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Based Antisepsis in Early Premature Infants A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Vanzi, Valentina
    Pitaro, Rosanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2018, 32 (04) : 341 - 350
  • [28] Newborn infant skin: Physiology, development, and care
    Visscher, Marty O.
    Adam, Ralf
    Brink, Susanna
    Odio, Mauricio
    [J]. CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 271 - 280