2% aqueous vs alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis in VLBW neonates undergoing peripheral venipuncture: a non-inferiority trial

被引:8
作者
Jain, Amish [1 ]
Deshpande, Poorva [1 ]
Yoon, Eugene W. [2 ]
Lee, Kyong-Soon [3 ]
McGeer, Allison [4 ]
Shah, Vibhuti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Maternal & Infant Care Res Ctr MiCare, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Div Neonatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Microbiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; POVIDONE-IODINE; CATHETER COLONIZATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NHS HOSPITALS; PREVENTION; GLUCONATE; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41372-022-01337-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate (AQC) vs. 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ALC) for pre-venipuncture skin antisepsis in very-low-birth-weight neonates (VLBW, birth-weight <1500 grams). STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomized 199 VLBW neonates, age 2-28 days, to receive pre-venipuncture skin preparation using single application of swabstick impregnated with AQC (n = 99) or ALC (n = 100). Skin clearance rate (percentage post-cleansing skin swabs with <15 bacterial colony forming units) with a 10% non-inferiority margin for AQC was primary outcome. Absolute and relative CFU reduction and adverse skin reactions were compared. RESULTS: AQC's clearance was non-inferior to ALC (91% vs. 88%; 95% CI -6.6%, +12.4%). Median (interquartile range) absolute [61 (16, 110) vs. 63 (18, 100); p = 0.65] and relative [100% (97%, 100%) vs. 100% (99.7%, 100%); p = 0.20] CFU reductions were similar. Neither group experienced any adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: AQC may provide non-inferior skin disinfection to ALC in VLBW neonates.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: A meta-analysis
    Chaiyakunapruk, N
    Veenstra, DL
    Lipsky, BA
    Saint, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (11) : 792 - 801
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheter insertion in preterm neonates: the ARCTIC randomised-controlled feasibility trial protocol
    Clarke, Paul
    Craig, Jean V.
    Wain, John
    Tremlett, Catherine
    Linsell, Louise
    Bowler, Ursula
    Juszczak, Ed
    Heath, Paul T.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [3] The burden of venipuncture pain in neonatal intensive care units: EPIPPAIN 2, a prospective observational study
    Courtois, Emilie
    Cimerman, Patricia
    Dubuche, Valerie
    Goiset, Marie-France
    Orfevre, Claire
    Lagarde, Audrey
    Sgaggero, Betty
    Guiot, Celine
    Goussot, Melanie
    Huraux, Etienne
    Nanquette, Marie-Christine
    Butel, Celine
    Ferreira, Anne-Marie
    Lacoste, Sylvie
    Sejourne, Sandrine
    Jolly, Valerie
    Lajoie, Gladys
    Maillard, Valerie
    Guedj, Romain
    Chappuy, Helene
    Carbajal, Ricardo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 57 : 48 - 59
  • [4] SURFACE COLONIZATION WITH COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI IN PREMATURE NEONATES
    DANGIO, CT
    MCGOWAN, KL
    BAUMGART, S
    STGEME, J
    HARRIS, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1989, 114 (06) : 1029 - 1034
  • [5] Current practices in skin antisepsis for central venous catheterisation in UK tertiary-level neonatal units
    Datta, M. K.
    Clarke, P.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2008, 93 (04): : F328 - F328
  • [6] Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the intensive care unit
    Frasca, Denis
    Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire
    Mimoz, Olivier
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (02):
  • [7] Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates
    Garland, J. S.
    Alex, C. P.
    Uhing, M. R.
    Peterside, I. E.
    Rentz, A.
    Harris, M. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 29 (12) : 808 - 813
  • [8] COMPARISON OF 10-PERCENT POVIDONE-IODINE AND 0.5-PERCENT CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE FOR THE PREVENTION OF PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER COLONIZATION IN NEONATES - A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL
    GARLAND, JS
    BUCK, RK
    MALONEY, P
    DURKIN, DM
    TOTHLLOYD, S
    DUFFY, M
    SZOCIK, P
    MCAULIFFE, TL
    GOLDMANN, D
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1995, 14 (06) : 510 - 516
  • [9] A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates
    Garland, JS
    Alex, CP
    Mueller, CD
    Otten, D
    Shivpuri, C
    Harris, MC
    Naples, M
    Pellegrini, J
    Buck, RK
    McAuliffe, TL
    Goldmann, DA
    Maki, DG
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (06) : 1431 - 1437
  • [10] Local reactions to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated antimicrobial dressing in very low birth weight infants
    Garland, JS
    Alex, CP
    Mueller, CD
    CislerKahill, LA
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1996, 15 (10) : 912 - 914