Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data

被引:230
作者
Barbera, Pablo [1 ]
Casas, Andreu [2 ]
Nagler, Jonathan [3 ]
Egan, Patrick J. [3 ]
Bonneau, Richard [4 ]
Jost, John T. [5 ]
Tucker, Joshua A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Sch Int Relat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] New York Univ, Ctr Data Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] New York Univ, Wilf Family Dept Polit, New York, NY USA
[4] Simons Fdn, Flatiron Inst, Ctr Computat Biol, New York, NY USA
[5] New York Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY USA
[6] New York Univ, Wilf Family Dept Polit, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0003055419000352
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Are legislators responsive to the priorities of the public? Research demonstrates a strong correspondence between the issues about which the public cares and the issues addressed by politicians, but conclusive evidence about who leads whom in setting the political agenda has yet to be uncovered. We answer this question with fine-grained temporal analyses of Twitter messages by legislators and the public during the 113thUSCongress. After employing an unsupervised methodthat classifies tweets sent by legislators and citizens into topics, we use vector autoregression models to explore whose priorities more strongly predict the relationship between citizens and politicians. We find that legislators are more likely to follow, than to lead, discussion of public issues, results that hold even after controlling for the agenda-setting effects of the media. We also find, however, that legislators are more likely to be responsive to their supporters than to the general public.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 901
页数:19
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [72] EFFECTS OF PUBLIC-OPINION ON POLICY
    PAGE, BI
    SHAPIRO, RY
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1983, 77 (01) : 175 - 190
  • [73] How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs
    Quinn, Kevin M.
    Monroe, Burt L.
    Colaresi, Michael
    Crespin, Michael H.
    Radev, Dragomir R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (01) : 209 - 228
  • [74] The Politics of Prioritization: Senators' Attention in 140 Characters
    Russell, Annelise
    [J]. FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2018, 16 (02): : 331 - 356
  • [75] US Senators on Twitter: Asymmetric Party Rhetoric in 140 Characters
    Russell, Annelise
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (04) : 695 - 723
  • [76] Schattschneider E.E., 1975, The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
  • [77] Schlozman KayLehman., 2012, The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400841912
  • [78] LINKING CONSTITUENCY OPINION AND SENATE VOTING SCORES - A HYBRID EXPLANATION
    SHAPIRO, CR
    BRADY, DW
    BRODY, RA
    FEREJOHN, JA
    [J]. LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 1990, 15 (04) : 599 - 621
  • [79] Politicians and the Policy Agenda: Does Use of Twitter by the U.S. Congress Direct New York Times Content?
    Shapiro, Matthew A.
    Hemphill, Libby
    [J]. POLICY AND INTERNET, 2017, 9 (01): : 109 - 132
  • [80] Shapiro Matthew A., 2012, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, P1