Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women

被引:18
作者
Carberry, Angela E. [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Adrienne [1 ]
Bond, Diana M. [1 ]
Hyett, Jon [3 ]
Raynes-Greenow, Camille H. [2 ]
Jeffery, Heather E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, RPA Women & Babies, RPA Newborn Care, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, RPA Women & Babies, Dept HIgh Risk Obstet, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2011年 / 12期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD008549.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Fetal growth restriction is defined as failure to reach growth potential and considered one of the major complications of pregnancy. These infants are often, although not universally, small for gestational age (SGA). SGA is defined as a weight less than a specified percentile (usually the 10th percentile). Identification of SGA infants is important because these infants are at increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Screening for SGA is a challenge for all maternity care providers and current methods of clinical assessment fail to detect many infants that are SGA. Large observational studies suggest that customised growth charts may be better able to differentiate between constitutional and pathologic smallness. Customised charts adjust for physiological variables such as maternal weight and height, ethnicity and parity. Objectives To assess the benefits and harms of using population-based growth charts compared with customised growth charts as a screening tool for detection of fetal growth in pregnant women. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2011), reviewed published guidelines and searched the reference lists of review articles. Selection criteria Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster randomised clinical trials comparing customised versus population-based growth charts used as a screening tool for detection of fetal growth in pregnant women. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Main results No randomised trials met the inclusion criteria. Authors' conclusions There is no randomised trial evidence currently available. Further randomised trials are required to accurately assess whether the improvement in detection shown is secondary to customised charts alone or an effect of the policy change. Future research in large trials is needed to investigate the benefits and harms (including perinatal mortality) of using customised growth charts in different settings and for both fundal height and ultrasound measurements
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The developmental origins of adult disease [J].
Barker, DJP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2004, 23 (06) :588S-595S
[2]   Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies [J].
Ben-Haroush, Avi ;
Yogev, Yariv ;
Hod, Moshe ;
Bar, Jacob .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2007, 130 (02) :187-192
[3]   Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation) [J].
Bricker, Leanne ;
Neilson, James P. ;
Dowswell, Therese .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04)
[4]   Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards [J].
Clausson, B ;
Gardosi, J ;
Francis, A ;
Cnattingius, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (08) :830-834
[5]   Management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: A consensus statement of the international societies of pediatric endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society [J].
Clayton, P. E. ;
Cianfarani, S. ;
Czernichow, P. ;
Johannsson, G. ;
Rapaport, R. ;
Rogol, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2007, 92 (03) :804-810
[6]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[7]   Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity [J].
Figueras, Francesc ;
Figueras, Josep ;
Meler, Eva ;
Eixarch, Elisenda ;
Coll, Oriol ;
Gratacos, Eduard ;
Gardosi, Jason ;
Carbonell, Xavier .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2007, 92 (04) :277-280
[8]   Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts [J].
Gardosi, J ;
Francis, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) :309-317
[9]   CUSTOMIZED ANTENATAL GROWTH CHARTS [J].
GARDOSI, J ;
CHANG, A ;
KALYAN, B ;
SAHOTA, D ;
SYMONDS, EM .
LANCET, 1992, 339 (8788) :283-287
[10]  
Gelbaya T A, 2005, J Obstet Gynaecol, V25, P445