The influence of head and neck position on ventilation with the i-gel airway in paralysed, anaesthetised patients

被引:37
作者
Sanuki, Takuro [1 ]
Uda, Rumiko [2 ]
Sugioka, Shingo [1 ]
Daigo, Erina [1 ]
Son, Hiroki [2 ]
Akatsuka, Masafumi [2 ]
Kotani, Junichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Dent Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Chuo Ku, Osaka 5400008, Japan
[2] Hirakata City Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Osaka, Japan
关键词
head and neck position; i-gel airway; ventilation; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; CUFF POSITION; CHILDREN; TUBE;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834698f4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Context and objective We hypothesised that head and neck position could affect the effectiveness of ventilation with the i-gel airway. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the influence of different head and neck positions on oropharyngeal sealing pressures and ventilation scores during ventilation with i-gel. Methods A single, experienced supraglottic airway device user inserted the i-gel in 20 paralysed, anaesthetised patients who were scheduled for oral surgery. Oropharyngeal leak pressures and ventilation scores were measured with the head and neck in the neutral position, flexed, extended or rotated to the right. Ventilation was scored from 0 to 3 based on three criteria (no leakage with an airway pressure of 15 cmH(2)O, bilateral chest excursion and a square wave capnogram; each item scoring 0 or 1 point). Results Compared with the neutral position (25.8 +/- 5.2 cmH(2)O), oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher with flexion (28.5 +/- 3.4 cmH(2)O, P = 0.015) and lower with extension (23.0 +/- 4.2 cmH(2)O, P = 0.015), but similar with rotation (26.7 +/- 5.1 cmH(2)O, P = 0.667). Flexion of the head and neck [2 (1-3)] adversely affected the ventilation score compared with the neutral position [3 (2-3), P = 0.004]. Conclusion Effective ventilation with an i-gel can be performed in patients in whom the head and neck is extended or rotated, whereas flexion of the head and neck adversely affects ventilation. Clinically, flexion of the head and neck should be avoided during ventilation with the i-gel. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28:597-599
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 599
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BRIMACOMBE J, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P457
[2]   The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway [J].
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :913-916
[3]   Alternative method for predicting optimal insertion depth of the laryngeal tube in children [J].
Kim, J. T. ;
Jeon, S. Y. ;
Kim, C. S. ;
Kim, S. D. ;
Kim, H. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (05) :704-707
[4]   Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children [J].
Kim, Jin-Tae ;
Na, Hyo-Seok ;
Bae, Ji-Young ;
Kim, Hyun-Jeong ;
Shin, Hwa-Yong ;
Kim, Hee-Soo ;
Kim, Chong-Sung ;
Kim, Seong-Deok .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 19 (02) :153-158
[5]   EFFECT OF GENERAL-ANESTHESIA ON THE PHARYNX [J].
NANDI, PR ;
CHARLESWORTH, CH ;
TAYLOR, SJ ;
NUNN, JF ;
DORE, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (02) :157-162
[6]   Influence of head and neck position on cuff position and oropharyngeal sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in children [J].
Okuda, K ;
Inagawa, G ;
Miwa, T ;
Hiroki, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (01) :122-124
[7]   The Influence of Head and Neck Position on the Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position of Three Supraglottic Airway Devices [J].
Park, Sang-Hyun ;
Han, Sung-Hee ;
Do, Sang-Hwan ;
Kim, Jung-Won ;
Kim, Jin-Hee .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (01) :112-117
[8]   A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study of ithe i-gel [J].
Richez, B. ;
Saltel, L. ;
Banchereau, F. ;
Torrielli, R. ;
Cros, A. M. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (04) :1137-1139
[9]   Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults [J].
Uppal, V. ;
Gangaiah, S. ;
Fletcher, G. ;
Kinsella, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (06) :882-885