Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial and Real-World Data

被引:7
作者
Cho, Jeong-Yeon [1 ]
Kwon, Sun-Hong [1 ]
Lee, Eui-Kyung [1 ]
Lee, Jeong-Hoon [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Hye-Lin [4 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Pharm, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Liver Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sahmyook Univ, Coll Pharm, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
cost-effectiveness; immunotherapy; adjuvant therapy; cytokine-induced killer cell; economic evaluation; hepatocellular carcinoma; CANCER; HEALTH; SORAFENIB; RESECTION; ABLATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.728740
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundStudies using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) have suggested that adjuvant cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell immunotherapy after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prolongs recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the cost-effectiveness of CIK cell immunotherapy as an adjuvant therapy for HCC compared to no adjuvant therapy is uncertain. MethodsWe constructed a partitioned survival model to compare the expected costs, life-year (LY), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a hypothetical population of 10,000 patients between CIK cell immunotherapy and no adjuvant therapy groups. Patients with HCC aged 55 years who underwent a potentially curative treatment were simulated with the model over a 20-year time horizon, from a healthcare system perspective. To model the effectiveness, we used OS and RFS data from RCTs and RWD. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and performed extensive sensitivity analyses. ResultsBased on the RCT data, the CIK cell immunotherapy incrementally incurred a cost of $61,813, 2.07 LYs, and 1.87 QALYs per patient compared to no adjuvant therapy, and the estimated ICER was $33,077/QALY. Being less than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, CIK cell immunotherapy was cost-effective. Using the RWD, the ICER was estimated as $25,107/QALY, which is lower than that obtained using RCT. The time horizon and cost of productivity loss were the most influential factors on the ICER. ConclusionWe showed that receiving adjuvant CIK cell immunotherapy was more cost-effective than no adjuvant therapy in patients with HCC who underwent a potentially curative treatment, attributed to prolonged survival, reduced recurrence of HCC, and better prognosis of recurrence. Receiving CIK cell immunotherapy may be more cost-effective in real-world clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[2]   Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Bruix, Jordi ;
Takayama, Tadatoshi ;
Mazzaferro, Vincenzo ;
Chau, Gar-Yang ;
Yang, Jiamei ;
Kudo, Masatoshi ;
Cai, Jianqiang ;
Poon, Ronnie T. ;
Han, Kwang-Hyub ;
Tak, Won Young ;
Lee, Han Chu ;
Song, Tianqiang ;
Roayaie, Sasan ;
Bolondi, Luigi ;
Lee, Kwan Sik ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi ;
Souza, Fabricio ;
Le Berre, Marie-Aude ;
Meinhardt, Gerold ;
Llovet, Josep M. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (13) :1344-1354
[3]   Early Detection and Curative Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in France and in the United States [J].
Cadier, Benjamin ;
Bulsei, Julie ;
Nahon, Pierre ;
Seror, Olivier ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Rosa, Isabelle ;
Layese, Richard ;
Costentin, Charlotte ;
Cagnot, Carole ;
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle ;
Chevreul, Karine .
HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 65 (04) :1237-1248
[4]  
Chon Young Eun, 2020, J Liver Cancer, V20, P135, DOI 10.17998/jlc.20.2.135
[5]  
European Assoc Study Liver, 2018, J HEPATOL, V69, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with S-1 [J].
Hisashige, Akinori ;
Sasako, Mitsuru ;
Nakajima, Toshifusa .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[7]   Improved curve fits to summary survival data: application to economic evaluation of health technologies [J].
Hoyle, Martin W. ;
Henley, William .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[8]   Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force [J].
Husereau, Don ;
Drummond, Michael ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Carswell, Chris ;
Moher, David ;
Greenberg, Dan ;
Augustovski, Federico ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Mauskopf, Josephine ;
Loder, Elizabeth .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) :231-250
[9]   Hepatocellular carcinoma among US and non US-born patients with chronic hepatitis B: Risk factors and age at diagnosis [J].
Kennedy, Kaitlyn ;
Graham, Susan M. ;
Arora, Nayan ;
Shuhart, Margaret C. ;
Kim, H. Nina .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09)
[10]   A guide for the utilization of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service National Patient Samples [J].
Kim, Logyoung ;
Kim, Jee-Ae ;
Kim, Sanghyun .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2014, 36