Straight to colonoscopy: the ideal patient pathway for the 2-week suspected cancer referrals?

被引:19
作者
Beggs, Andrew D. [1 ]
Bhate, Ravinda D. [1 ]
Irukulla, Shashi [1 ]
Achiek, Mayen [1 ]
Abulafi, A. Muti [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayday Univ Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Croydon CR7 7YE, England
关键词
Urgent suspected cancer; Straight to test; Colonoseopy; COLORECTAL-CANCER;
D O I
10.1308/003588411X12851639107917
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION The UK has a higher mortality for colon cancer than the European average. The UK Government introduced a 2-week referral target for patients with colorectal symptoms meeting certain criteria and 62-day target for the delivery of treatment from the date of referral for those patients diagnosed with cancer. Hospitals are expected to meet 100% and 95% of these targets, respectively; therefore, an efficient and effective patient pathway is required to deliver diagnosis and treatment within this period. It is suggested that 'straight-to-test' will help this process and we have examined our implementation of 'straight-to-colonoscopy' as a method of achieving this aim. PATIENTS AND METHODS We carried out a retrospective audit of 317 patients referred under the 2-week rule over a 1-year period between October 2004 and September 2005 and were eligible for 'straight-to-colonoscopy'. Demographic data, appropriateness of referral and colonoscopy findings were obtained. The cost effectiveness and impact on waiting period were also analysed. RESULTS A total of 317 patients were seen within 2 weeks. Cancer was found in 23 patients and all were treated within 62 days. Forty-four patients were determined by the specialist to have been referred inappropriately because they did not meet NICE referral guidelines. No cancer was found in any of the inappropriate referrals. The use of straight-to-test colonoscopy lead to cost savings of 26,176 (82.57 pound/patient) in this group compared to standard practice. There was no increase in waiting times. CONCLUSIONS Straight-to-colonoscopy for urgent suspected cancer referrals is a safe, feasible and cost-effective method for delivery of the 62-day target and did not lead to increase in the endoscopy waiting list.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 119
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Referral letters for 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer do not allow a 'straight-to-test' pathway [J].
Aljarabah, M. M. ;
Borley, N. R. ;
Goodman, A. J. ;
Wheeler, J. M. D. .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2009, 91 (02) :106-109
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NHS CANC PLAN PLAN I
[3]  
*ASS COL GREAT BRI, 1996, GUID MAN COL CANC
[4]  
BAIG MK, 1999, GUT S1, V44, P16
[5]   A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? [J].
Bowles, CJA ;
Leicester, R ;
Romaya, C ;
Swarbrick, E ;
Williams, CB ;
Epstein, O .
GUT, 2004, 53 (02) :277-283
[6]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, REF GUID SUSP CANC
[7]   Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? Not too well [J].
Jones, R ;
Rubin, G ;
Hungin, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7302) :1555-1556
[8]   Colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma [J].
Makinen, M. J. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 50 (01) :131-150
[9]  
*NAT I HLTH CLIN E, REF SUSP CANC NICE G
[10]   Prospective, five-year follow-up study of patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease [J].
Salem, Tarek A. ;
Molloy, Richard G. ;
O'Dwyer, Patrick J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (09) :1460-1464