The Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) and person-centred care: Concurrent validity in acute hospital settings

被引:12
作者
Bridges, Jackie [1 ,2 ]
Gould, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Hope, Joanna [1 ,2 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Griffiths, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Hlth Sci, Bldg 67,Univ Rd,Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
[2] Natl Inst Hlth Res CLAHRC Wessex, Bldg 67,Univ Rd,Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2019年 / 1卷
关键词
Communication; Hospitals; Process assessment (Health care); Professional-patient relations; Quality of health care; Social skills; OLDER PATIENTS; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2019.100001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: There is a lack of consensus on how the practices of health care workers may be assessed and measured in relation to compassion. The Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) is a promising measure that uses independent observers to assess the quality of social interactions between staff and patients in a healthcare context. Further understanding of the relationship between QuIS and constructs such as person-centred care would be helpful to guide its future use in health research.Objective: This study aimed to assess the validity of QuIS in relation to person-centred care measured using the CARES & REG; Observational Tool (COTTM).Methods: 168 nursing staff-patient care interactions on adult inpatient units in two acute care UK National Health Service hospitals were observed and rated using QuIS and COTTM. Analyses explored the relationship between summary and individual item COTTM scores and the likelihood of a negative (lower quality) QuIS rating.Results: As the degree of person-centred care improved, QuIS negative ratings generally decreased and positive social ratings increased. QuIS-rated negative interactions were associated with an absence of some behaviours, in particular staff approaching patients from the front (relative risk (RR) 3.7), introducing themselves (RR 3.1), smiling and making eye contact (RR 3.4), and involving patients in their care (RR 3.7).Conclusion: These findings provide further information about the validity of QuIS measurements in healthcare contexts, and the extent to which it can be used to reflect the quality of relational care even for people who are unable to self-report.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Quantity and quality of interaction between staff and older patients in UK hospital wards: A descriptive study [J].
Barker, Hannah Ruth ;
Griffiths, Peter ;
Mesa-Eguiagaray, Ines ;
Pickering, Ruth ;
Gould, Lisa ;
Bridges, Jackie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 62 :100-107
[2]   Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review [J].
Blomberg, Karin ;
Griffiths, Peter ;
Wengstrom, Yvonne ;
May, Carl ;
Bridges, Jackie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 62 :137-155
[3]  
Bridges J., 2018, Health services and delivery research, V6, DOI [DOI 10.3310/HSDR06330, 10.3310/hsdr06330]
[4]  
Bridges J., 2019, CREATING LEARNING EN
[5]   Older people's and relatives' experiences in acute care settings: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies [J].
Bridges, Jackie ;
Flatley, Mary ;
Meyer, Julienne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (01) :89-107
[6]  
Brooker D., 1995, J MENTAL OFHEALTH, V4, P145, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638239550037686
[7]   Dignity and the essence of medicine: the A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care [J].
Chochinov, Harvey .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7612) :184-187
[8]   THE QUALITY OF INTERACTIONS SCHEDULE (QUIS) - DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY AND USE IN THE EVALUATION OF 2 DOMUS UNITS [J].
DEAN, R ;
PROUDFOOT, R ;
LINDESAY, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 8 (10) :819-826
[9]   THE DOMUS PHILOSOPHY - A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF 2 RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR THE ELDERLY MENTALLY-ILL [J].
DEAN, R ;
BRIGGS, K ;
LINDESAY, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 8 (10) :807-817
[10]   Person-centred care of people with severe Alzheimer's disease: current status and ways forward [J].
Edvardsson, David ;
Winblad, Bengt ;
Sandman, P. O. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2008, 7 (04) :362-367