Efficacy of palatal block for analgesia following palatoplasty in children with cleft palate

被引:38
作者
Jonnavithula, Nirmala [1 ]
Durga, Padmaja
Madduri, Vamsikrishna
Ramachandran, Gopinath
Nuvvula, Rambabu
Srikanth, R.
Damalcheruvu, Mukunda R.
机构
[1] Nizams Inst Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Hyderabad 500082, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
anesthetic technique; cleft palate; palate nerve supply; pediatric pain; regional; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN RELIEF; LIDOCAINE; REPAIR; SALINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03347.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
P>Background: This prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of palatal block i.e. blocking of naso palatine, greater and also lesser palatine nerves in children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty by evaluating its effects on intraoperative anesthetic requirement, postoperative analgesia and parental satisfaction. Methods: Forty-five pediatric patients aged below five undergoing cleft palate repair were randomly allocated to three groups of 15 each. After tracheal intubation, Group NB received no block for control, group S received 0.5 ml of normal saline and group B received 0.5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for palatal block. Postoperative pain score, the time to first demand of analgesia and number of rescue analgesic demands were noted. Finally, the parental satisfaction was graded. Results: The block had no anesthetic sparing effect. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received block than in the group NB. The mean area under curve for FLACC score in group NB was 29 with 95% CI of 25-32, group S was 15 with 95% CI of 8.9-22.3 and in group B, it was 10 with 95% CI of 6-14. The time to first demand of analgesia was 6 [4.5-6] h in group NB, 18 [6-18] h in group S and 18 [18-18] h in group B (P-0.000). The number of demands of rescue analgesia was significantly less in group B 0 [0-0.25], 0 [0-2] in S group compared to group NB 3 [3-3] (P-0.000). The parental satisfaction was good in patients who received block and poor in group NB. Conclusion: Palatal block is technically simple, safe and effectively provides postoperative analgesia with good parental satisfaction. Injection of saline also produced palatal nerve block; however, the effect was not consistent.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 733
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bremerich DH, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P907
[2]  
Brenda G., 2003, Wylie and Churchill Davidson, A practice of anaesthesia, V7th, P1267
[3]   Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Chanrachakul, B ;
Likittanasombut, P ;
O-Prasertsawat, P ;
Herabutya, Y .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (04) :592-595
[4]   Parent-controlled analgesia in children undergoing cleft palate repair [J].
Choi, Seung Ho ;
Lee, Woo Kyung ;
Lee, Sung Jin ;
Bai, Sun Jun ;
Lee, Su Hyun ;
Park, Beyoung Yun ;
Min, Kyeong Tae .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 23 (01) :122-125
[5]   Continuous epidural block versus continuous popliteal nerve block for postoperative pain relief after major podiatric surgery in children: A prospective, comparative randomized study [J].
Dadure, C ;
Bringuier, S ;
Nicolas, F ;
Bromilow, L ;
Raux, O ;
Rochette, A ;
Capdevila, X .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03) :744-749
[6]  
Doyle E., 1992, Paediatr Anaesth, V2, P139
[7]  
HAUPERT MS, 2004, ARCH OTOLARYNNGOL HE, V130, P1205
[8]   Bilateral intra-oral, infra-orbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia following cleft lip repair in paediatric patients: comparison of bupivacaine vs bupivacaine-pethidine combination [J].
Jonnavithula, N. ;
Durga, P. ;
Kulkarni, D. K. ;
Ramachandran, G. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (06) :581-585
[9]  
Kadar A A, 2003, J Pak Med Assoc, V53, P422
[10]   Clinical study of otological manifestations in cases of cleft palate [J].
S. Y. Khan ;
R. Paul ;
A. Sengupta ;
P. Roy .
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 2006, 58 (1)