Socioeconomic indicators of health inequalities and female mortality: a nested cohort study within the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

被引:7
作者
Bailey, Katharine [1 ]
Ryan, Andy [1 ]
Apostolidou, Sophia [1 ]
Fourkala, Evangelia [1 ]
Burnell, Matthew [1 ]
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra [1 ]
Kalsi, Jatinderpal [1 ]
Parmar, Max [2 ]
Jacobs, Ian [1 ,3 ]
Pikhart, Hynek [4 ]
Menon, Usha [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, Dept Womens Canc, Maple House,149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7DN, England
[2] UCL, Med Res Council Clin Trials Unit, London WC2B 6NH, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Med & Human Sci, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[4] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W1T 7DN, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
UKCTOCS; Mortality; Socioeconomic; Education; IMD; HEART-DISEASE MORTALITY; EDUCATIONAL-LEVEL; INCOME INEQUALITY; SOCIAL-CLASS; AREA-LEVEL; POPULATION; SURVIVAL; DEATH; RISK; DIFFERENTIALS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-015-1609-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence is mounting that area-level socioeconomic indicators are important tools for predicting health outcomes. However, few studies have examined these alongside individual-level education. This nested cohort study within the control arm of the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) assesses the association of mutually adjusted individual (education) and area-level (Index of Multiple Deprivation-IMD 2007) socioeconomic status indicators and all-cause female mortality. Methods: Participants resident in England who had completed both baseline (Wave 1) and follow up (Wave 2) questionnaires were included. Follow-up was through the Health and Social Care Information Centre with deaths censored on 31st December 2012. IMD, education and a range of covariates were explored. Cox regression models adjusted for all covariates were used. Sensitivity analysis using imputation was performed (1) including those with missing data and (2) on the entire cohort who had completed the baseline questionnaire. Results: Of the 54,539 women resident in England who completed both Wave 1 and Wave 2 questionnaires, 4,510 had missing data. The remaining 50,029 women were included in the primary analysis. Area-level IMD was positively associated with all-cause mortality for the most deprived group compared to the least deprived (HR=1.42, CI=1.14-1.78) after adjusting for all potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results with stronger associations in the entire cohort (HR=1.90, CI=1.68-2.16). The less educated an individual, the higher the mortality risk (test for trend p=<0.001). However, the crude effect on mortality of having no formal education compared to college/university education disappeared when adjusted for IMD rank (HR=1.08, CI=0.93-1.26). Conclusion: Women living in more deprived areas continue to have higher mortality even in this less deprived cohort and after adjustment for a range of potential confounders.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome [J].
Aarts, Mieke J. ;
Lemmens, Valery E. P. P. ;
Louwman, Marieke W. J. ;
Kunst, Anton E. ;
Coebergh, Jan Willem W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (15) :2681-2695
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LANCET, V383, P383, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60134-3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Northern Ireland multiple deprivation measure
[4]   Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in 10 western European populations during the 1990s [J].
Avendano, M ;
Kunst, AE ;
Huisman, M ;
Lenthe, FV ;
Bopp, M ;
Regidor, E ;
Glickman, M ;
Costa, G ;
Spadea, T ;
Deboosere, P ;
Borrell, C ;
Valkonen, T ;
Gisser, R ;
Borgan, JK ;
Gadeyne, S ;
Mackenbach, JP .
HEART, 2006, 92 (04) :461-467
[5]   Analysing Recent Socioeconomic Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in England, 2000-2007: A Population Modelling Study [J].
Bajekal, Madhavi ;
Scholes, Shaun ;
Love, Hande ;
Hawkins, Nathaniel ;
O'Flaherty, Martin ;
Raine, Rosalind ;
Capewell, Simon .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (06) :12
[6]   SIX EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS AND HEALTH INEQUALITIES: A DESCRIPTIVE OVERVIEW [J].
Benach, Joan ;
Solar, Orielle ;
Vergara, Montserrat ;
Vanroelen, Christophe ;
Santana, Vilma ;
Castedo, Antia ;
Ramos, Javier ;
Muntaner, Carles .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2010, 40 (02) :269-280
[7]  
BenShlomo Y, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1013
[8]   The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Stage of Cancer at Diagnosis and Survival A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada [J].
Booth, Christopher M. ;
Li, Gavin ;
Zhang-Salomons, Jina ;
Mackillop, William J. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (17) :4160-4167
[9]   Impact on mortality and cancer incidence rates of using random invitation from population registers for recruitment to trials [J].
Burnell, Matthew ;
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra ;
Ryan, Andy ;
Apostolidou, Sophia ;
Habib, Mariam ;
Kalsi, Jatinderpal ;
Skates, Steven ;
Parmar, Mahesh ;
Seif, Mourad W. ;
Amso, Nazar N. ;
Godfrey, Keith ;
Oram, David ;
Herod, Jonathan ;
Williamson, Karin ;
Jenkins, Howard ;
Mould, Tim ;
Woolas, Robert ;
Murdoch, John ;
Dobbs, Stephen ;
Leeson, Simon ;
Cruickshank, Derek ;
Campbell, Stuart ;
Fallowfield, Lesley ;
Jacobs, Ian ;
Menon, Usha .
TRIALS, 2011, 12
[10]   Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: the role of neo-liberalism [J].
Coburn, D .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (01) :135-146