The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants

被引:21
作者
Anner, R
Better, H
Chaushu, G
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Unit, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
bone remodeling; bone resorption; dental implants; endosseous; follow-up studies; hydroxyapatite/therapeutic use;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.1013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Five- and 6 mm diameter screw-type endosseous implants have been used for the last decade. While some studies have reported very promising results (94% to 98% success rate), others have demonstrated survival rates below those clinically acceptable (75% to 87%). Moreover, such implants have been associated with increased cervical bone resorption and thread exposure. Methods: Between June 1999 and July 2003, 43 patients received treatment with 6 mm diameter tapered hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants. A total of 45 implants were placed. All patients were recalled annually after implant exposure. One patient was lost to follow-up after I year. Forty-four implants were evaluated at the recall examinations. All implants supported a fixed prosthesis; in the majority of patients (35 implants), it was a single-tooth fixed prosthesis. The mean loading time was 23.4 months (range, 1 to 54 months). Results: No implants were lost during the loading period. The overall survival rate was 100%. Crestal bone remodeling was examined using periapical radiographs. After a mean of 23.4 months in function, only one implant presented bone loss beyond the first thread. Conclusions: This study showed that high survival rates can be obtained after prosthetic treatment with 6 mm-wide tapered HA-coated implants. Long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1015
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Bahat O, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P379
[2]   A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces [J].
Cochran, DL .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1999, 70 (12) :1523-1539
[3]  
Graves S L, 1994, Aust Prosthodont J, V8, P31
[4]  
Handelsman M, 1998, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V19, P507
[5]  
Ivanoff CJ, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P173
[6]  
Langer B, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P400
[7]  
Lee JJ, 2000, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V58, P1372, DOI 10.1053/joms.2000.18269
[8]  
Minsk L, 1996, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V17, P848
[9]  
Quirynen M, 1992, Clin Oral Implants Res, V3, P104, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
[10]  
Renouard F, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P101