共 50 条
Reinterventions in the modern era of thoracic endovascular aortic repair
被引:27
|作者:
Fairman, Alexander S.
[1
]
Beck, Adam W.
[2
]
Malas, Mahmoud B.
[3
]
Goodney, Philip P.
[4
]
Osborne, Nicholas H.
[5
]
Schermerhorn, Marc L.
[6
]
Wang, Grace J.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, 3400 Spruce St,4 Silverstein Pavil, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham Hosp, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Sect Vasc Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词:
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR);
Reinterventions;
Thoracic aortic pathologies;
SECONDARY INTERVENTIONS;
NATIONAL TRENDS;
CLINICAL-TRIAL;
DISSECTION;
ANEURYSMS;
EXPERIENCE;
MANAGEMENT;
ENDOLEAKS;
GRAFT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.484
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective: Using a national data set, we sought to describe the population of patients and the nature and timing of reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by aortic disease as well as their impact on survival. Methods: We evaluated the national data set for TEVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2017. Student t- test and chi(2) analysis were used to compare continuous and categorical variables in the reintervention and no reintervention groups, respectively. Freedom from reintervention and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: A total of 7006 patients were evaluated: 51.2% thoracic aortic aneurysm, 33.5% type B dissection (TBD), 7.0% penetrating aortic ulcer, 6.7% trauma, and 1.6% intramural hematoma. Overall, 553 patients (7.9%) underwent at least one reintervention, with an in-hospital reintervention rate of 3.5%. Reinterventions were most commonly performed for TBD (11.5%), with reinterventions for other diseases occurring at lower rates: thoracic aortic aneurysm, 6.7%; intramural hematoma, 5.4%; penetrating aortic ulcer, 4.8%; and trauma, 1.8%. The most common cause of reintervention across all aortic diseases was type I endoleak. The most common long-term reinterventions were placement of endovascular stent graft (65%), other surgical treatments (15.9%), other endovascular treatment (13%), endovascular branch treatment (12.4%), surgical treatment with no device removal (11.0%), and surgical branch treatment (10.4%). Freedom from reintervention was decreased for TBD compared with other diseases (P <.001). There was no difference in survival comparing patients undergoing reinterventions and those without (P = .87). However, patients undergoing in-hospital reintervention trended toward increased mortality (P = .075). Conclusions: Whereas reinterventions were not rare after TEVAR, there was no difference in mortality between patients undergoing reintervention and those without. Patients undergoing TEVAR for TBD demonstrated the highest reintervention rate. This study highlights the importance of long-term follow-up to address disease-specific patterns of reintervention.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 422
页数:15
相关论文