The dynamics of institution building: State aids, the European commission, and the court of justice of the European Union

被引:2
作者
Alves, Amanda M. [1 ]
Brousseau, Eric [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yeung, Timothy Yu-Cheong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 09, DRM, Governance & Regulat Chair, PSL, Pl Marechal Lattre Tassigny, F-75016 Paris, France
[2] Iris Governance Analytics2019, Pl Marechal Lattre Tassigny, F-75016 Paris, France
[3] PSL Univ, Pl Marechal Lattre Tassigny, F-75016 Paris, France
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Law, Tiensestr 41, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Checks and Balances; European Union; Institution Building; DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT; INTEGRATION; EU; SOCIALIZATION; ENFORCEMENT; LEGITIMACY; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2021.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the interactions between European Union institutions and the Member States with regard to state aid control. The mandate of the European Commission includes the maintenance and strengthening of economic integration, and as such it may discipline any Member States that undermine the single market. Relying on an original database covering all state aid applications with rulings between 2000 and 2017, we show that, on the one hand, the Commission tends to reject programs originating from countries that are resistant to EU integration, which is proxied by the transposition deficit. On the other hand, when firms or national governments appeal the decisions made by the Commission, the reversal of the Commission's rejection decisions by the Court of Justice of the European Union is positively correlated with the transposition deficit. This evidence suggests that while the Commission is biased against countries with greater resistance to integration, the Court corrects this bias since its mandate is to guarantee the rule of law in the EU system of governance. We argue that these revealed policy preferences are consistent with the assumption that these two bodies attempt to strengthen their legitimacy by making decisions in line with their mandates. Moreover, the interaction between these twin pursuits of legitimacy reinforces the overall legitimacy of the Union, suggesting another driver of evolution in an equilibrium approach of institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 859
页数:24
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P385
  • [2] Adam C, 2016, EUR ADMIN GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-57832-7
  • [3] Corporate political strategies in Europe: The determinants of firms' access to the European Commission
    Alves, Amanda M.
    [J]. BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2020, 22 (02) : 307 - 338
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, Toward a comparative institutional analysis, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/6867.001.0001
  • [5] Much ado about money and how to spend it! Analysing 40 years of annulment cases against the European Union Commission
    Bauer, Michael W.
    Hartlapp, Miriam
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (02) : 202 - 222
  • [6] Bellier I., 1996, Revue francaise de science politique, V46, P431
  • [7] Why Are Modern Bureaucracies Special? State Support to Private Firms in Early Eighteenth-Century France
    Beuve, Jean
    Brousseau, Eric
    Sgard, Jerome
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2017, 77 (04) : 1144 - 1176
  • [8] Mind the gap!: European integration between level and scope
    Börzel, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2005, 12 (02) : 217 - 236
  • [9] Brousseau E., 2021, OXFORD HDB I INT EC
  • [10] Determinants of the European Commission's State Aid Decisions
    Buts C.
    Jegers M.
    Joris T.
    [J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2011, 11 (4) : 399 - 426