Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in small for gestational age pregnancies

被引:11
作者
Blumenfeld, Yair J. [1 ]
Lee, Henry C. [2 ]
Pullen, Kristin M. [3 ]
Wong, Amy E.
Pettit, Kate [4 ]
Taslimi, M. Mark
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neonatol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Kaiser San Francisco, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Fetal; small gestational age; ultrasound; accuracy; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; BIRTH-WEIGHT; SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION; DIABETIC PREGNANCIES; ACCURACY; VOLUME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; RETARDATION; MACROSOMIA; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3109/14767050903387052
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. Approximately half of small for gestational age (SGA) cases are due to maternal or fetal pathology, and may result in significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) measurement is the cornerstone of ultrasonographic findings when diagnosing and managing SGA pregnancies. Our objective was to determine the ultrasound accuracy of EFW in SGA pregnancies. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed of all pregnancies complicated by SGA from a single institution (Stanford University) over a 2-year-period (2004-2006). SGA was defined as EFW <= 10%. 98 neonates whose last ultrasound for EFW occurred within 7 days of delivery were included in the study. The absolute differences between the EFW and birthweight (BW) were analyzed, and the absolute percent errors were calculated as (EFW - BW)/BW x 100. The mean absolute differences and mean absolute percent errors were analyzed across all gestational ages (GA) and EFWs using one-way analysis of variance. Results. The mean absolute percent error for the entire cohort was 8.7% (+/- 6.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean absolute percent error across all GAs (<32 weeks, 32-36 weeks, >36 weeks), and EFWs (<1500 g, 1500-2000 g, >2000 g). Conclusion. Ultrasound measurement of EFW in SGA pregnancies is consistent across all GAs and EFW measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 793
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*ACOG, 2000, ACOG PRACT B, V12
[2]   Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction [J].
Baschat, Ahmet A. ;
Cosmi, Erich ;
Bilardo, Catarina M. ;
Wolf, Hans ;
Berg, Christoph ;
Rigano, Serena ;
Germer, Ute ;
Moyano, Dolores ;
Turan, Sifa ;
Hartung, John ;
Bhide, Amarnath ;
Muller, Thomas ;
Bower, Sarah ;
Nicolaides, Kypros H. ;
Thilaganathan, Baskaran ;
Gembruch, Ulrich ;
Ferrazzi, Enrico ;
Hecher, Kurt ;
Galan, Henry L. ;
Harman, Chris R. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02) :253-261
[3]  
Ben-Haroush A, 2004, J PERINAT MED, V32, P113
[4]   Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia [J].
Ben-Haroush, A ;
Yogev, Y ;
Mashiach, R ;
Hod, M ;
Meisner, I .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03) :225-230
[5]   Fetal upper arm volume in predicting intrauterine growth restriction: A three-dimensional ultrasound study [J].
Chang, CH ;
Yu, CH ;
Ko, HC ;
Chen, CL ;
Chang, FM .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 31 (11) :1435-1439
[6]  
Chauhan SP, 1999, J REPROD MED, V44, P969
[7]   Sonographic estimate of birth weight among high-risk patients: Feasibility and factors influencing accuracy [J].
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Parker, Donna ;
Shields, Dawn ;
Sanderson, Maureen ;
Cole, Jill H. ;
Scardo, Jarnes. A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (02) :601-606
[8]  
DIVON MY, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P611
[9]   A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight [J].
Dudley, NJ .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (01) :80-89
[10]   Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death [J].
Froen, JF ;
Gardosi, JO ;
Thurmann, A ;
Francis, A ;
Stray-Pedersen, B .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (09) :801-807