Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on the Muscle Activity and Joint Movements in Different Standing Postures Conditions

被引:8
|
作者
Mitsutake, Tsubasa [1 ]
Taniguchi, Takanori [1 ]
Nakazono, Hisato [2 ]
Yoshizuka, Hisayoshi [1 ]
Sakamoto, Maiko [3 ]
机构
[1] Fukuoka Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Fac Med Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Fukuoka Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Saga Univ, Fac Med Educ & Res Ctr Community Med, Saga, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
standing posture; noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation; lower limb; angular velocity; joint movement; muscle activity; THRESHOLD; RESONANCE; RESPONSES; NEURONS; BALANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2022.891669
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
ObjectiveNoisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is an effective method for stabilizing posture; however, little is known regarding the detailed muscle activity and joint movement in the standing posture. This study aimed to clarify the changes in the lower limb muscle activity and joint angular velocity by nGVS intervention using the simultaneous assessment method of inertial measurement units and surface electromyography (EMG). MethodsSeventeen healthy participants were assessed for their physical responses under four conditions (standing on a firm surface with eyes-open/eyes-closed, and a foam surface with eyes-open/eyes-closed) without stimulation (baseline) and with stimulation (sham or nGVS). Noise stimuli were applied for 30 s at a level below the perceptual threshold. The body control response was evaluated using EMG activity and angular velocity of the lower limbs. ResultRegarding the change from baseline for each parameter, there was a significant interactive effect of EMG activity in the muscle type x intervention and EMG activity and angular velocity in the condition x intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the angular velocity was significantly decreased in the abduction-adduction direction in the standing on a foam surface with eyes-closed condition compared to that with eyes-open in the nGVS intervention. ConclusionOur results suggest that nGVS altered physical responses in different standing postural conditions. The present study is exploratory and therefore the evidence should be investigated in future studies specifically target those muscle activities and joint motion parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Saito, Miki
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Onishi, Hideaki
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [2] The Effects of Stochastic Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Body Sway and Muscle Activity
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Oku, Kosuke
    Mori, Nobuhiko
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [3] Effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on functional reach test
    Takahashi, Hirona
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Kawakami, Saki
    Onishi, Hideaki
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2023, 810
  • [4] Effect of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on center of pressure sway of static standing posture
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Masaki, Mitsuhiro
    Saito, Kei
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Kojima, Sho
    Onishi, Hideaki
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [5] Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human posture and perception while standing
    Wardman, DL
    Taylor, JL
    Fitzpatrick, RC
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2003, 551 (03): : 1033 - 1042
  • [6] Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on perception of subjective vertical in standing humans
    Tardy-Gervet, MF
    Severac-Cauquil, A
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1998, 86 (03) : 1155 - 1161
  • [7] No evidence for stochastic resonance effects on standing balance when applying noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation in young healthy adults
    L. Assländer
    L. S. Giboin
    M. Gruber
    R. Schniepp
    M. Wuehr
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [8] No evidence for stochastic resonance effects on standing balance when applying noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation in young healthy adults
    Asslaender, L.
    Giboin, L. S.
    Gruber, M.
    Schniepp, R.
    Wuehr, M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [9] No evidence for after-effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion perception
    Keywan, Aram
    Badarna, Hiba
    Jahn, Klaus
    Wuehr, Max
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [10] Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation During a Bimanual Tracking Robotic Task
    Valdes, Bulmaro A.
    Menon, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13